BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21978055)

  • 1. A method for patient dose reduction in dynamic contrast enhanced CT study.
    Kim SM; Haider MA; Milosevic M; Jaffray DA; Yeung IW
    Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5094-103. PubMed ID: 21978055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved accuracy of quantitative parameter estimates in dynamic contrast-enhanced CT study with low temporal resolution.
    Kim SM; Haider MA; Jaffray DA; Yeung IW
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):388. PubMed ID: 26745932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interindividual variability of arterial impulse response to intravenous injection of nonionic contrast agent (Iohexol) in DCE-CT study.
    Kim SM; Haider MA; Milosevic M; Yeung IW
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4791-802. PubMed ID: 19928109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging-derived measurements in patients with cervical cancer.
    Kim SM; Haider MA; Milosevic M; Yeung IW
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2013 Mar; 33(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 23383694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voxelwise comparison of perfusion parameters estimated using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) computed tomography and DCE-magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Kallehauge J; Nielsen T; Haack S; Peters DA; Mohamed S; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Hansen DC; Rasmussen F; Tanderup K; Pedersen EM
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 24003852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.
    Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the potential use of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters as radiomic features of cervical cancer.
    Lu Y; Peng W; Song J; Chen T; Wang X; Hou Z; Yan Z; Koh TS
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5098-5109. PubMed ID: 31523829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
    Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
    Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phase-based arterial input function measurements in the femoral arteries for quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and comparison with DCE-CT.
    Korporaal JG; van den Berg CA; van Osch MJ; Groenendaal G; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Nov; 66(5):1267-74. PubMed ID: 21604291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
    NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of a reference tissue arterial input function with low-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI data.
    Heisen M; Fan X; Buurman J; van Riel NA; Karczmar GS; ter Haar Romeny BM
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4871-83. PubMed ID: 20679692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiphasic contrast injection for improved precision of parameter estimates in functional CT.
    Kim SM; Cho YB; Haider MA; Milosevic M; Yeung IW
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5921-33. PubMed ID: 19175147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge.
    Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
    Tomography; 2016 Mar; 2(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27200418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint arterial input function and tracer kinetic parameter estimation from undersampled dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a model consistency constraint.
    Guo Y; Lingala SG; Bliesener Y; Lebel RM; Zhu Y; Nayak KS
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2804-2815. PubMed ID: 28905411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracer kinetic models as temporal constraints during brain tumor DCE-MRI reconstruction.
    Lingala SG; Guo Y; Bliesener Y; Zhu Y; Lebel RM; Law M; Nayak KS
    Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 31663134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operator dependency of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Kleppestø M; Bjørnerud A; Groote IR; Kim M; Vardal J; Larsson C
    MAGMA; 2022 Feb; 35(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 34213687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of prostate cancer.
    Korporaal JG; van Vulpen M; van den Berg CA; van der Heide UA
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Jan; 47(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 21610505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.
    Schabel MC; Fluckiger JU; DiBella EV
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4783-806. PubMed ID: 20679691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.