149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21978318)
21. Prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score correlation in heterogenous tumors: proposal for a composite Gleason score.
Arias-Stella JA; Shah AB; Montoya-Cerrillo D; Williamson SR; Gupta NS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1213-8. PubMed ID: 26274028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.
Berg KD; Røder MA; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 23889119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic significance of histologic grading in patients with prostate carcinoma who are assessed by the Gleason and World Health Organization grading systems in needle biopsies obtained prior to radiotherapy.
Lilleby W; Torlakovic G; Torlakovic E; Skovlund E; Fosså SD
Cancer; 2001 Jul; 92(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 11466684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Gleason grading after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy retains prognostic value for systemic progression following radical prostatectomy.
Stewart SB; Cheville JC; Sebo TJ; Frank I; Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Gettman MT; Tollefson MK; Umbriet EC; Psutka SP; Bergstralh EJ; Rangel L; Karnes RJ
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2014 Dec; 17(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 25156060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Agreement of Gleason score on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: is there improvement with increased number of biopsy cylinders and the 2005 revised Gleason scoring?
Van Praet C; Libbrecht L; D'Hondt F; Decaestecker K; Fonteyne V; Verschuere S; Rottey S; Praet M; De Visschere P; Lumen N;
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Jun; 12(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 24361055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The percentage of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma in prostate biopsies significantly improves on Grade Groups in the prediction of prostate cancer death.
Berney DM; Beltran L; Sandu H; Soosay G; Møller H; Scardino P; Murphy J; Ahmad A; Cuzick J;
Histopathology; 2019 Oct; 75(4):589-597. PubMed ID: 31032963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.
Song W; Bang SH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Kim CK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29550198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Significance of nuclear factor - kappa beta activation on prostate needle biopsy samples in the evaluation of Gleason score 6 prostatic carcinoma indolence.
Zupancic M; Pospihalj B; Cerovic S; Gazic B; Drev P; Hocevar M; Perhavec A
Radiol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 54(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 32324163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer improves Gleason score assessment in favorable risk prostate cancer.
Kamrava M; Kishan AU; Margolis DJ; Huang J; Dorey F; Lieu P; Kupelian PA; Marks LS
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 26059510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Dong F; Wang C; Farris AB; Wu S; Lee H; Olumi AF; McDougal WS; Young RH; Wu CL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 22592143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Fine SW; Algaba F; Aron M; Baydar DE; Beltran AL; Brimo F; Cheville JC; Colecchia M; Comperat E; da Cunha IW; Delprado W; DeMarzo AM; Giannico GA; Gordetsky JB; Guo CC; Hansel DE; Hirsch MS; Huang J; Humphrey PA; Jimenez RE; Khani F; Kong Q; Kryvenko ON; Kunju LP; Lal P; Latour M; Lotan T; Maclean F; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mehra R; Menon S; Miyamoto H; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Nguyen JK; Osunkoya AO; Parwani A; Robinson BD; Rubin MA; Shah RB; So JS; Takahashi H; Tavora F; Tretiakova MS; True L; Wobker SE; Yang XJ; Zhou M; Zynger DL; Trpkov K
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 145(4):461-493. PubMed ID: 32589068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
