These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21978610)

  • 1. Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: curve analysis.
    Touboul D; Bénard A; Mahmoud AM; Gallois A; Colin J; Roberts CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2144-50. PubMed ID: 21978610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer.
    Schweitzer C; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Colin J; Maurice-Tison S; Kerautret J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 May; 51(5):2403-10. PubMed ID: 19907025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.
    Ortiz D; Piñero D; Shabayek MH; Arnalich-Montiel F; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1371-5. PubMed ID: 17662426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 27(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 20481414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
    Galletti JG; Pförtner T; Bonthoux FF
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes.
    Saad A; Lteif Y; Azan E; Gatinel D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):2912-6. PubMed ID: 20042662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in keratoconic versus post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors.
    Zarei-Ghanavati S; Ramirez-Miranda A; Yu F; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):607-14. PubMed ID: 22440435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in topographically normal relatives of patients with keratoconus.
    Kara N; Altinkaynak H; Baz O; Goker Y
    Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 22677642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical and morphological corneal response to placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus.
    Dauwe C; Touboul D; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Kérautret J; Fournier P; Malecaze F; Colin J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1761-7. PubMed ID: 19781473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Graft biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus.
    Feizi S; Einollahi B; Yazdani S; Hashemloo A
    Cornea; 2012 Aug; 31(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 22357385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo biomechanical changes after corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: 1-year analysis of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
    Greenstein SA; Fry KL; Hersh PS
    Cornea; 2012 Jan; 31(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 21993470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyser.
    Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Jun; 32(3):129-32; quiz 151. PubMed ID: 19233712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Chen MC; Lee N; Bourla N; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1886-91. PubMed ID: 19006734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.
    Luce DA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 15721708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course of corneal biomechanical parameters after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Ohmoto F
    Ophthalmic Res; 2009; 42(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 19641338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and confocal microscopy findings in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Hurmeric V; Sahin A; Ozge G; Bayer A
    Cornea; 2010 Jun; 29(6):641-9. PubMed ID: 20458238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Second-generation corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and manifest keratoconic corneas after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors.
    Zhang L; Danesh J; Tannan A; Phan V; Yu F; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2196-204. PubMed ID: 26703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.