BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21979533)

  • 1. Crafting interactivity for stakeholder engagement: transforming assumptions about communication in science and policy.
    Aakhus M
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):531-5. PubMed ID: 21979533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the IRPA Guiding Principles on Stakeholder Engagement: putting theory into practice.
    Jones CR
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 21979548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communication of radiation benefits and risks in decision making: some lessons learned.
    Locke PA
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 21979551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of the International Radiation Protection Association.
    Kase KR; Metcalf P
    Health Phys; 2011 Jan; 100(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 21399420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constraints to microbial food safety policy: opinions from stakeholder groups along the farm to fork continuum.
    Sargeant JM; Ramsingh B; Wilkins A; Travis RG; Gavrus D; Snelgrove JW
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2007; 54(5):177-84. PubMed ID: 17542959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Policy decision-making under scientific uncertainty: radiological risk assessment and the role of expert advisory groups.
    Mossman KL
    Health Phys; 2009 Aug; 97(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 19590269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Community Environmental Monitoring Program: a case study of public education and involvement in radiological monitoring.
    Shafer DS; Hartwell WT
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):606-17. PubMed ID: 21979549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Managing the disposition of potentially radioactive scrap metal.
    Chen SY
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):461-9. PubMed ID: 17033456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving radioactive waste management: an overview of the Environmental Protection Agency's low-activity waste effort.
    Schultheisz DJ; Czyscinski KS; Klinger AD
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 17033466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involving stakeholders and developing a policy for stakeholder involvement in the European network for health technology assessment, EUnetHTA.
    Nielsen CP; Lauritsen SW; Kristensen FB; Bistrup ML; Cecchetti A; Turk E;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():84-91. PubMed ID: 20030895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How do we combine science and regulations for decision making following a terrorist incident involving radioactive materials?
    Poston JW; Ford JR
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 19820465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On risky ground: the water professional in politics.
    Holmes PR
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(7):117-25. PubMed ID: 15195426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conscious worst case definition for risk assessment, part I: a knowledge mapping approach for defining most critical risk factors in integrative risk management of chemicals and nanomaterials.
    Sørensen PB; Thomsen M; Assmuth T; Grieger KD; Baun A
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(18):3852-9. PubMed ID: 19945144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. International standards related to the classification and deregulation of radioactive waste.
    Linsley G
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):470-8. PubMed ID: 17033457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk-based approaches to deal with uncertainty in a data-poor system: stakeholder involvement in hazard identification for marine national parks and marine sanctuaries in Victoria, Australia.
    Carey JM; Beilin R; Boxshall A; Burgman MA; Flander L
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):271-81. PubMed ID: 17362414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis: from science to application.
    Berger ML; Teutsch S
    Med Care; 2005 Jul; 43(7 Suppl):49-53. PubMed ID: 16056009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of public-interest group positions on radiation protection.
    Florig HK
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 17033464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.