BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21979538)

  • 1. The London polonium incident: lessons in risk communications.
    Rubin GJ; AmlĂ´t R; Page L
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):545-50. PubMed ID: 21979538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The international follow-up of individuals potentially exposed to polonium-210 in London 2006.
    Shaw K; Anders K; Olowokure B; Fraser G; Maguire H; Bailey M; Smith J; Frossell S; Yap K; Evans B;
    Public Health; 2010 Jun; 124(6):319-25. PubMed ID: 20580977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Federal interagency communication strategies for addressing radiation emergencies and other public health crises.
    Miller CW; McCurley MC
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):559-61. PubMed ID: 21979540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing public health risk in the London polonium-210 incident, 2006.
    Maguire H; Fraser G; Croft J; Bailey M; Tattersall P; Morrey M; Turbitt D; Ruggles R; Bishop L; Giraudon I; Walsh B; Evans B; Morgan O; Clark M; Lightfoot N; Gilmour R; Gross R; Cox R; Troop P
    Public Health; 2010 Jun; 124(6):313-8. PubMed ID: 20542303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epidemiology of internal contamination with polonium-210 in the London incident, 2006.
    Fraser G; Giraudon I; Cohuet S; Bishop L; Maguire H; Thomas HL; Mandal S; Anders K; Sanchez-Padilla E; Charlett A; Evans B; Gross R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2012 Feb; 66(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 21636613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk communication and radiological/nuclear terrorism: a strategic view.
    Becker SM
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21979539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suspected radioactive contamination: evaluation of 45 Israeli citizens potentially exposed to polonium-210 in London.
    Brosh-Nissimov T; Havkin O; Davidovitch N; Poles L; Shapira C
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2008 Feb; 10(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 18432019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incident and Emergency Centre of the IAEA.
    Baciu F; Buglova E; Martincic R; Spiegelberg Planer R; Stern W; Winkler G
    Health Phys; 2010 Jun; 98(6):779-83. PubMed ID: 20445379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communication of radiation benefits and risks in decision making: some lessons learned.
    Locke PA
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 21979551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communications Challenges in Crisis and Transition.
    Laver S
    Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):206-207. PubMed ID: 30086016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polonium-210: lessons learned from the contamination of individual Canadians.
    Cornett J; Tracy B; Kramer G; Whyte J; Moodie G; Auclair JP; Thomson D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jun; 134(3-4):164-6. PubMed ID: 19470445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public information needs after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210 in London: cross sectional telephone survey and qualitative analysis.
    Rubin GJ; Page L; Morgan O; Pinder RJ; Riley P; Hatch S; Maguire H; Catchpole M; Simpson J; Wessely S
    BMJ; 2007 Dec; 335(7630):1143. PubMed ID: 17975252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Murder by radiation poisoning: implications for public health.
    Miller CW; Whitcomb RC; Ansari A; McCurley C; Nemhauser JB; Jones R
    J Environ Health; 2012 Jun; 74(10):8-13. PubMed ID: 22708201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk communication considerations to facilitate the screening of mass populations for potential contamination with radioactive material.
    Emery RJ; Sprau DD; Morecook RC
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5 Suppl):S168-74. PubMed ID: 18849710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exercise Maritime Response (EXMR): lessons learned for population monitoring and communications.
    Kramer GH; Johnson S; Hauck B; Capello K; Quayle D
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5 Suppl):S112-22. PubMed ID: 17440322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiological incident preparedness for community hospitals: a demonstration project.
    Jafari ME
    Health Phys; 2010 Aug; 99 Suppl 2():S123-35. PubMed ID: 20622560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
    Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Organization of the nuclear emergency plan].
    Van Bladel L; Vandecasteele C
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):337-40. PubMed ID: 16408829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.