These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21980897)

  • 21. The right to remain in ignorance about genetic information--can such a right be defended in the name of autonomy?
    Malpas P
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1220):U1611. PubMed ID: 16132072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey.
    Lawrence RE; Curlin FA
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Apr; 35(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 19332575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Bioethics. New challenges, new conflicts in healthcare].
    Sánchez López JD; Cambil Martín J; Villegas Calvo M; Moreno Martín ML
    J Healthc Qual Res; 2019; 34(5):272-273. PubMed ID: 31713524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country.
    Murgic L; Hébert PC; Sovic S; Pavlekovic G
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 26420014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Treatment based on patient's consent: controversies, doubts, ambiguities].
    Zaba C; Swiderski P; Zaba Z; Klimberg A; Przybylski Z
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 17571516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finnish doctors and the realisation of patient autonomy in the context of end of life decision making.
    Hildén HM; Honkasalo ML; Louhiala P
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Jun; 32(6):316-20. PubMed ID: 16731727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Relationships with patients: the core of our profession].
    Jonas C
    Presse Med; 2013 Jan; 42(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23058880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Patient participation in clinical training of medical students. Interviews with teachers, patients and students].
    Lynöe N; Ekblad S; Elinder G
    Lakartidningen; 2008 Sep 17-23; 105(38):2568-71. PubMed ID: 18846859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cesarean section without clinical indication versus vaginal delivery as a paradigmatic model in the discourse of medical setting decisions.
    Demontis R; Pisu S; Pintor M; D'aloja E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1470-5. PubMed ID: 21158491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A guide to assessing decision-making capacity.
    Jones RC; Holden T
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2004 Dec; 71(12):971-5. PubMed ID: 15641525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ethics for the pediatrician: autonomy, beneficence, and rights.
    Cummings CL; Mercurio MR
    Pediatr Rev; 2010 Jun; 31(6):252-5. PubMed ID: 20516238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Respecting the dying patient's rights.
    Pitorak EF
    Home Healthc Nurse; 2003 Dec; 21(12):833-6. PubMed ID: 14665971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Should a doctor stop rendering medical services? Principles of conduct towards patients attempting to commit suicide. Part 1 -- the Polish perspective.
    Zajdel J; Zajdel R; Krakowiak A
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2013; 20(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 23540231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient choices, family interests, and physician obligations.
    Mappes TA; Zembaty JS
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Mar; 4(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 11645254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A bridge too far: individualised claims of conscience.
    Smith SW
    Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(2):283-302. PubMed ID: 25903681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maternal and fetal best interests in day-to-day obstetrics.
    Yeo GS; Lim ML
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2011 Jan; 40(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 21369632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Power imbalance prevents shared decision making.
    Joseph-Williams N; Edwards A; Elwyn G
    BMJ; 2014 May; 348():g3178. PubMed ID: 25134115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Geriatricians' views of advance decisions and their use in clinical care in England: qualitative study.
    Bond CJ; Lowton K
    Age Ageing; 2011 Jul; 40(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 21429949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conflicting Values: A Case Study in Patient Choice and Caregiver Perspectives.
    Eves MM; Danziger PD; Farrell RM; Cole CM
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2015; 5(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 26300149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Conscientious objection in the clinical setting. A proposal for its appropriate use].
    Couceiro A; Seoane JA; Hernando P
    Rev Calid Asist; 2011; 26(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 21543247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.