These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21981037)

  • 1. The consultation and relational empathy measure: an investigation of its scaling structure.
    Kersten P; White PJ; Tennant A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2012; 34(6):503-9. PubMed ID: 21981037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internal construct validity of the Oxford Knee Scale: evidence from Rasch measurement.
    Conaghan PG; Emerton M; Tennant A
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Dec; 57(8):1363-7. PubMed ID: 18050174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.
    Malaty HM; Abudayyeh S; O'Malley KJ; Wilsey MJ; Fraley K; Gilger MA; Hollier D; Graham DY; Rabeneck L
    Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e210-5. PubMed ID: 15687428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activity outcome measurement for postacute care.
    Haley SM; Coster WJ; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Ni P; Bond TL; Sinclair SJ; Jette AM
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I49-61. PubMed ID: 14707755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the "Consultation and Relational Empathy" (CARE) measure by means of Rasch-analysis at the example of cancer patients.
    Wirtz M; Boecker M; Forkmann T; Neumann M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Mar; 82(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 21256692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal construct validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis questionnaire: Rasch analysis of a disease-specific outcome measure for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Comer CM; Conaghan PG; Tennant A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1969-76. PubMed ID: 21289573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the CARE measure in a general medicine outpatient setting.
    Aomatsu M; Abe H; Abe K; Yasui H; Suzuki T; Sato J; Ban N; Mercer SW
    Fam Pract; 2014 Feb; 31(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 24115011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS)--statistical properties and model fit of an instrument to assess change processes in pain related disability.
    Wicksell RK; Lekander M; Sorjonen K; Olsson GL
    Eur J Pain; 2010 Aug; 14(7):771.e1-14. PubMed ID: 20106685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain.
    Coster WJ; Haley SM; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Bond TL; Ni PS
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I62-72. PubMed ID: 14707756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding and measuring patients' assessment of the quality of nursing care.
    Lynn MR; McMillen BJ; Sidani S
    Nurs Res; 2007; 56(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 17495571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A combined-method psychometric analysis recommended modification of the multidimensional health locus of control scales.
    Kelly PA; Kallen MA; Suárez-Almazor ME
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 May; 60(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 17419954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critique of Rasch analysis using the Dyspnoea-12 as an illustrative example.
    Yorke J; Horton M; Jones PW
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Jan; 68(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 21658094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rasch analysis of three versions of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.
    Davidson M
    Man Ther; 2008 Jun; 13(3):222-31. PubMed ID: 17363319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.
    Radwin LE; Cabral HJ
    J Adv Nurs; 2010 Mar; 66(3):683-9. PubMed ID: 20423403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice.
    Mercer SW; McConnachie A; Maxwell M; Heaney D; Watt GC
    Fam Pract; 2005 Jun; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 15772120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of an instrument to measure parental satisfaction with quality of care in neonatal follow-up.
    Butt ML; Pinelli J; Boyle MH; Thomas H; Hunsberger M; Saigal S; Lee DS; Fanning JK; Austin P
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Feb; 30(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 19194325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: an assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch analysis.
    Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Rees G; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1001-6. PubMed ID: 17325138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Personal Impact Health Assessment Questionnaire (PI HAQ) to capture the impact of disability in osteoarthritis.
    Wylde V; Livesey C; Learmonth ID; Blom AW; Hewlett S
    Musculoskeletal Care; 2010 Jun; 8(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 20232480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spanish-language version of the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care (MRPS): preliminary validation.
    Beattie PF; Nelson RM; Lis A
    Phys Ther; 2007 Jun; 87(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 17442835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis.
    ten Klooster PM; Oostveen JC; Zandbelt LC; Taal E; Drossaert CH; Harmsen EJ; van de Laar MA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Apr; 87(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 21889864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.