467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21981046)
1. Influence of different mucosal resiliency and denture reline on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during osseointegration. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; dos Santos MB
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e833-7. PubMed ID: 21981046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of thickness and area of reline on the stress distribution in peri-implant bone during the healing period: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e231-6. PubMed ID: 22782057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in peri-implant bone with relined dentures and different heights of healing caps.
Dos Santos MB; Da Silva Neto JP; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Sep; 38(9):691-6. PubMed ID: 21449909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of different soft liners on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during healing period. A 3D finite element analysis.
dos Santos MB; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 21767204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution.
Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 19076244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An examination of the stress distribution in a soft-lined acrylic resin mandibular complete denture by finite element analysis.
Shim JS; Watts DC
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11203603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of bone insertion level of support teeth in class I mandibular removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant: a study using finite element analysis.
Verri FR; Pellizzer EP; Pereira JA; Zuim PR; Santiago Júnior JF
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 21613946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Koka P; Mohapatra A; Anandapandian PA; Murugesan K; Vasanthakumar M
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22945697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D finite element analysis of changes in stress levels and distributions for an osseointegrated implant after vertical bone loss.
Yoon KH; Kim SG; Lee JH; Suh SW
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 21811169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights.
Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strain analysis of maxillary complete denture with three-dimensional finite element method.
Cheng YY; Cheung WL; Chow TW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):309-18. PubMed ID: 20416415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
