267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21981731)
1. Predicting complex quantitative traits with Bayesian neural networks: a case study with Jersey cows and wheat.
Gianola D; Okut H; Weigel KA; Rosa GJ
BMC Genet; 2011 Oct; 12():87. PubMed ID: 21981731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting expected progeny difference for marbling score in Angus cattle using artificial neural networks and Bayesian regression models.
Okut H; Wu XL; Rosa GJ; Bauck S; Woodward BW; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Gianola D
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Sep; 45(1):34. PubMed ID: 24024641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of neural networks with back-propagation to genome-enabled prediction of complex traits in Holstein-Friesian and German Fleckvieh cattle.
Ehret A; Hochstuhl D; Gianola D; Thaller G
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):22. PubMed ID: 25886037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting complex traits using a diffusion kernel on genetic markers with an application to dairy cattle and wheat data.
Morota G; Koyama M; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jun; 45(1):17. PubMed ID: 23763755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between linear and non-parametric regression models for genome-enabled prediction in wheat.
Pérez-Rodríguez P; Gianola D; González-Camacho JM; Crossa J; Manès Y; Dreisigacker S
G3 (Bethesda); 2012 Dec; 2(12):1595-605. PubMed ID: 23275882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement of prediction ability for genomic selection of dairy cattle by including dominance effects.
Sun C; VanRaden PM; Cole JB; O'Connell JR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e103934. PubMed ID: 25084281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Multiple-Trait Bayesian Lasso for Genome-Enabled Analysis and Prediction of Complex Traits.
Gianola D; Fernando RL
Genetics; 2020 Feb; 214(2):305-331. PubMed ID: 31879318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deep learning versus parametric and ensemble methods for genomic prediction of complex phenotypes.
Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Gianola D; Peñagaricano F
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Feb; 52(1):12. PubMed ID: 32093611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of support vector regression to genome-assisted prediction of quantitative traits.
Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA
Theor Appl Genet; 2011 Nov; 123(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21739137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers.
Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Kranis A; González-Recio O
Genet Res (Camb); 2010 Jun; 92(3):209-25. PubMed ID: 20667165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving genomic prediction accuracy for meat tenderness in Nellore cattle using artificial neural networks.
Brito Lopes F; Magnabosco CU; Passafaro TL; Brunes LC; Costa MFO; Eifert EC; Narciso MG; Rosa GJM; Lobo RB; Baldi F
J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Sep; 137(5):438-448. PubMed ID: 32020678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genome-enabled prediction of genetic values using radial basis function neural networks.
González-Camacho JM; de Los Campos G; Pérez P; Gianola D; Cairns JE; Mahuku G; Babu R; Crossa J
Theor Appl Genet; 2012 Aug; 125(4):759-71. PubMed ID: 22566067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpretable artificial neural networks incorporating Bayesian alphabet models for genome-wide prediction and association studies.
Zhao T; Fernando R; Cheng H
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34499126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.
De los Campos G; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Crossa J
Genet Res (Camb); 2010 Aug; 92(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 20943010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive ability of genome-assisted statistical models under various forms of gene action.
Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhi A; Kranis A; Tusell L; Morota G; Rosa GJM; Gianola D
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12309. PubMed ID: 30120288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marker-assisted prediction of non-additive genetic values.
Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA
Genetica; 2011 Jul; 139(7):843-54. PubMed ID: 21674154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
