These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21982071)

  • 21. Robotics in urological surgery: review of current status and maneuverability, and comparison of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopy.
    Singh I
    Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21198426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of environmental noise on robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical performance.
    Siu KC; Suh IH; Mukherjee M; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Surgery; 2010 Jan; 147(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 19879611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
    van der Schatte Olivier RH; Van't Hullenaar CD; Ruurda JP; Broeders IA
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18855053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
    Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ablative and reconstructive robotic-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery.
    Murphy D; Challacombe B; Olsburgh J; Calder F; Mamode N; Khan MS; Mushtaq I; Dasgupta P
    Int J Clin Pract; 2008 Nov; 62(11):1703-8. PubMed ID: 18284446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Initial laboratory experience with a novel ultrasound probe for standard and single-port robotic kidney surgery: increasing console surgeon autonomy and minimizing instrument clashing.
    Yakoubi R; Autorino R; Laydner H; Guillotreau J; White MA; Hillyer S; Spana G; Khanna R; Isaac W; Haber GP; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH
    Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 22213385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robot-assisted abdominal surgery.
    Gutt CN; Oniu T; Mehrabi A; Kashfi A; Schemmer P; Büchler MW
    Br J Surg; 2004 Nov; 91(11):1390-7. PubMed ID: 15386325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.
    Ballantyne GH
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1389-402. PubMed ID: 12140630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic abdominal surgery.
    Hanly EJ; Talamini MA
    Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4A Suppl):19S-26S. PubMed ID: 15476648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.
    Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. PARAMIS parallel robot for laparoscopic surgery.
    Pisla D; Plitea N; Vaida C; Hesselbach J; Raatz A; Vlad L; Graur F; Gyurka B; Gherman B; Suciu M
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2010; 105(5):677-83. PubMed ID: 21141094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model.
    Nio D; Balm R; Maartense S; Guijt M; Bemelman WA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Mar; 27(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 14760597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Robot-assisted (Da Vinci) laparoscopic uretero-pelvic junction repair. Results of experimental surgery in a series of 14 pigs].
    Hubert J; Feuillu B; Mangin P; Artis M; Villemot JP
    Prog Urol; 2002 Sep; 12(4):592-6. PubMed ID: 12463116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study.
    Guru KA; Kuvshinoff BW; Pavlov-Shapiro S; Bienko MB; Aftab MN; Brady WE; Mohler JL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jan; 204(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 17189118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.
    Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Dulabon LM; Patel MN; Lipkin M; Wang AJ; Stifelman MD
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic surgery and resident training.
    De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report.
    Partin AW; Adams JB; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 7582231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery. A current perspective.
    Lunca S; Bouras G; Stanescu AC
    Rom J Gastroenterol; 2005 Dec; 14(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 16400356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.