These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21982266)

  • 1. Mandibular reconstruction using extraoral trifocal bone transport: report of a case using a new device.
    Agarwal R; Agarwal S; Chandra R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1739-44. PubMed ID: 21982266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transport distraction: mandibular reconstruction.
    Stucki-McCormick SU; Fox R; Mizrahi R
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 11905332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Osteosynthesis and simultaneous irregular trifocal distraction osteogenesis for segmental mandibular defect after tumor ablative surgery: a case report.
    Hirota M; Chikumaru H; Matsui Y; Adachi M; Aoki S; Watanuki K; Ozawa T; Iwai T; Tohnai I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):651-5. PubMed ID: 18602309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular reconstruction through transport distraction using intraoral appliance.
    Andrade NN; Reshamwala SM; Subburaj K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2260-9. PubMed ID: 21435769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of a novel intraorally customized transport distraction device in the reconstruction of segmental mandibular defect.
    Cai M; Lu X; Yang D; Cheng H; Shen G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):1015-8. PubMed ID: 24699108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandible reconstruction with transport distraction osteogenesis.
    Spagnoli D
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2008 Sep; 16(2):287-307. PubMed ID: 18710697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentate transport discs can be used to reconstruct large segmental mandibular defects.
    Elsalanty ME; Malavia V; Zakhary I; Mulone T; Kontogiorgos ED; Dechow PC; Opperman LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):745-58. PubMed ID: 25661502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandibular reconstruction using intraoral trifocal bone transport: report of a case.
    Takenobu T; Nagano M; Taniike N; Furutani M; Tanaka Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 17466884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmental mandibular reconstruction by microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis: an animal study.
    Ayoub AF; Richardson W; Koppel D; Thompson H; Lucas M; Schwarz T; Smith L; Boyd J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 39(5):356-64. PubMed ID: 11601816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
    Boccaccio A; Cozzani M; Pappalettere C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 20709724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment of bilateral condylar fractures of the mandible with distraction osteogenesis device.
    Lee Y; Kim K
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Jan; 123(1):28e-29e. PubMed ID: 19116519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distraction osteogenesis of a fibula free flap used for mandibular reconstruction: preliminary report.
    Siciliano S; Lengelé B; Reychler H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Dec; 26(6):386-90. PubMed ID: 10036655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis demonstrates significantly increased vascularity in comparison to fracture repair in the mandible.
    Donneys A; Tchanque-Fossuo CN; Farberg AS; Deshpande SS; Buchman SR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):328-32. PubMed ID: 22337436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transport distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of the ramus-condyle unit of the temporomandibular joint: surgical technique.
    Schwartz HC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2197-200. PubMed ID: 19761913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transport disc distraction osteogenesis as an alternative protocol for mandibular reconstruction.
    Kim SM; Park JM; Myoung H; Lee JH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Aug; 63(8):e644-6. PubMed ID: 20034862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unilateral mandibular widening with distraction osteogenesis.
    Tae KC; Kang KH; Kim SC
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1053-60. PubMed ID: 16448255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double-step transport distraction osteogenesis in the reconstruction of unilateral large mandibular defects after tumour resection using internal distraction devices.
    Wang JJ; Chen J; Ping FY; Yan Fg
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):587-95. PubMed ID: 22209499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dental assisted distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Results of an animal experimental study and initial clinical application].
    Braumann B; Niederhagen B; Schmolke C; von Lindern JJ
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 Jan; 3(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 10077960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconstruction of curved mandibular angle defects using a new internal transport distraction device: an experiment in goats.
    Zhou LB; Shang HT; Hu M; Li DC; Sigare S; Chen BL; Liu YP; Zhao JL
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 46(6):445-8. PubMed ID: 18336969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction in previously irradiated areas: clinical experiences.
    Kashiwa K; Kobayashi S; Nohara T; Yasuoka T; Hosoya Y; Fujiwara H; Honda T; Kimura H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1571-6. PubMed ID: 19098554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.