85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21982540)
1. Bromate removal by anaerobic bacterial community: mechanism and phylogenetic characterization.
Assunção A; Martins M; Silva G; Lucas H; Coelho MR; Costa MC
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Dec; 197():237-43. PubMed ID: 21982540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aluminum and sulphate removal by a highly Al-resistant dissimilatory sulphate-reducing bacteria community.
Martins M; Taborda R; Silva G; Assunção A; Matos AP; Costa MC
Biodegradation; 2012 Sep; 23(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 22367464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phylogenetic characterization of bromate-reducing microbial community enriched anaerobically from activated sludge.
Wang D; Cai X; Lv X; Wang Y; Gao X; Zhu Y; Zhang T; Mao Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Nov; 184():109630. PubMed ID: 31520951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of bromate-reducing bacterial isolates and their potential for drinking water treatment.
Davidson AN; Chee-Sanford J; Lai HY; Ho CH; Klenzendorf JB; Kirisits MJ
Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(18):6051-62. PubMed ID: 21943884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phenotypic characterization of Rice Cluster III archaea without prior isolation by applying quantitative polymerase chain reaction to an enrichment culture.
Kemnitz D; Kolb S; Conrad R
Environ Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 7(4):553-65. PubMed ID: 15816932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction of bromate to bromide coupled to acetate oxidation by anaerobic mixed microbial cultures.
van Ginkel CG; van Haperen AM; van der Togt B
Water Res; 2005 Jan; 39(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 15607164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of treatment efficacy and stability of microbial populations between raw and anaerobically treated liquid pig manure, using PCR-DGGE and 16S sequencing.
Bouity-Voubou MD; Frigon JC; Guiot S; Brousseau R
Can J Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 54(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 18388976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of primer sets for detecting 16S rRNA and hydrazine oxidoreductase genes of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in marine sediments.
Li M; Hong Y; Klotz MG; Gu JD
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Mar; 86(2):781-90. PubMed ID: 20107988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Community characterization of anaerobic methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)-degrading enrichment cultures.
Youngster LK; Kerkhof LJ; Häggblom MM
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2010 May; 72(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 20180853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diversity of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in a granular sludge anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) reactor.
Quan ZX; Rhee SK; Zuo JE; Yang Y; Bae JW; Park JR; Lee ST; Park YH
Environ Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 10(11):3130-9. PubMed ID: 18479446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Denitrifying microbial community with the ability to bromate reduction in a rotating biofilm-electrode reactor.
Zhong Y; Yang Q; Fu G; Xu Y; Cheng Y; Chen C; Xiang R; Wen T; Li X; Zeng G
J Hazard Mater; 2018 Jan; 342():150-157. PubMed ID: 28826057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of uranium (VI) on two sulphate-reducing bacteria cultures from a uranium mine site.
Martins M; Faleiro ML; Chaves S; Tenreiro R; Costa MC
Sci Total Environ; 2010 May; 408(12):2621-8. PubMed ID: 20334901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term effects of operating temperature and sulphate addition on the methanogenic community structure of anaerobic hybrid reactors.
Pender S; Toomey M; Carton M; Eardly D; Patching JW; Colleran E; O'Flaherty V
Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):619-30. PubMed ID: 14723931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arsenite-oxidizing and arsenate-reducing bacteria associated with arsenic-rich groundwater in Taiwan.
Liao VH; Chu YJ; Su YC; Hsiao SY; Wei CC; Liu CW; Liao CM; Shen WC; Chang FJ
J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Apr; 123(1-2):20-9. PubMed ID: 21216490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial community structure in experimental methanogenic bioreactors and search for pathogenic clostridia as community members.
Dohrmann AB; Baumert S; Klingebiel L; Weiland P; Tebbe CC
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Mar; 89(6):1991-2004. PubMed ID: 21042796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge.
Rivière D; Desvignes V; Pelletier E; Chaussonnerie S; Guermazi S; Weissenbach J; Li T; Camacho P; Sghir A
ISME J; 2009 Jun; 3(6):700-14. PubMed ID: 19242531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterisation of prototype Nurmi cultures using culture-based microbiological techniques and PCR-DGGE.
Waters SM; Murphy RA; Power RF
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 110(3):268-77. PubMed ID: 16814892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular analysis of a sulphate-reducing consortium used to treat metal-containing effluents.
Boothman C; Hockin S; Holmes DE; Gadd GM; Lloyd JR
Biometals; 2006 Dec; 19(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 16946985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biogeographical distribution of diverse anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (anammox) bacteria in Cape Fear River Estuary.
Dale OR; Tobias CR; Song B
Environ Microbiol; 2009 May; 11(5):1194-207. PubMed ID: 19161435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anaerobic bio-removal of uranium (VI) and chromium (VI): comparison of microbial community structure.
Martins M; Faleiro ML; Chaves S; Tenreiro R; Santos E; Costa MC
J Hazard Mater; 2010 Apr; 176(1-3):1065-72. PubMed ID: 20036051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
