These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21982579)

  • 21. Visual cues and food intake: A preregistered replication of Wansink et al. (2005).
    Lopez A; Choi AK; Dellawar NC; Cullen BC; Avila Contreras S; Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Feb; 153(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 37917442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Internal and external cues of meal cessation: the French paradox redux?
    Wansink B; Payne CR; Chandon P
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2007 Dec; 15(12):2920-4. PubMed ID: 18198299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distinct foods with smaller unit would be an effective approach to achieve sustainable weight loss.
    Chang UJ; Suh HJ; Yang SO; Hong YH; Kim YS; Kim JM; Jung EY
    Eat Behav; 2012 Jan; 13(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 22177403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence of a self-serving bias in people's attributions for their food intake.
    Vartanian LR; Reily NM; Spanos S; Herman CP; Polivy J
    Appetite; 2024 Oct; 201():107583. PubMed ID: 38944056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition label. Influence on perceptions and intake of cereal.
    Roberto CA; Shivaram M; Martinez O; Boles C; Harris JL; Brownell KD
    Appetite; 2012 Apr; 58(2):651-7. PubMed ID: 22248710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Super Bowls: serving bowl size and food consumption.
    Wansink B; Cheney MM
    JAMA; 2005 Apr; 293(14):1727-8. PubMed ID: 15827310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preventing the pack size effect: exploring the effectiveness of pictorial and non-pictorial serving size recommendations.
    Versluis I; Papies EK; Marchiori D
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():116-26. PubMed ID: 25528692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduced food intake after exposure to subtle weight-related cues.
    Brunner TA; Siegrist M
    Appetite; 2012 Jun; 58(3):1109-12. PubMed ID: 22425649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Increased portion size leads to a sustained increase in energy intake over 4 d in normal-weight and overweight men and women.
    Kelly MT; Wallace JM; Robson PJ; Rennie KL; Welch RW; Hannon-Fletcher MP; Brennan S; Fletcher A; Livingstone MB
    Br J Nutr; 2009 Aug; 102(3):470-7. PubMed ID: 19216813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How many calories are on our plate? Expected fullness, not liking, determines meal-size selection.
    Brunstrom JM; Rogers PJ
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2009 Oct; 17(10):1884-90. PubMed ID: 19543204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanisms behind the portion size effect: visibility and bite size.
    Burger KS; Fisher JO; Johnson SL
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2011 Mar; 19(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 20948520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does meal duration predict amount consumed in lone diners? An evaluation of the time-extension hypothesis.
    Brindal E; Wilson C; Mohr P; Wittert G
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 21477628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Drug use is associated with elevated food consumption in college students.
    Nolan LJ; Stolze MR
    Appetite; 2012 Jun; 58(3):898-906. PubMed ID: 22349780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of allocation of attention on habituation to olfactory and visual food stimuli in children.
    Epstein LH; Saad FG; Giacomelli AM; Roemmich JN
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Feb; 84(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 15708783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cage use and feeding height preferences of captive common marmosets (Callithrix j. jacchus) in two-tier cages.
    Buchanan-Smith HM; Shand C; Morris K
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2002; 5(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 12738582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Getting a bigger slice of the pie. Effects on eating and emotion in restrained and unrestrained eaters.
    Polivy J; Herman CP; Deo R
    Appetite; 2010 Dec; 55(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 20691231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Volume and variety: relative effects on food intake.
    Norton GN; Anderson AS; Hetherington MM
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):714-22. PubMed ID: 16516251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in attention to food and food intake between overweight/obese and normal-weight females under conditions of hunger and satiety.
    Nijs IM; Muris P; Euser AS; Franken IH
    Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):243-54. PubMed ID: 19922752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measuring 'expected satiety' in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli.
    Brunstrom JM; Shakeshaft NG; Scott-Samuel NE
    Appetite; 2008 Nov; 51(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 18547677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The weight of the container influences expected satiety, perceived density, and subsequent expected fullness.
    Piqueras-Fiszman B; Spence C
    Appetite; 2012 Apr; 58(2):559-62. PubMed ID: 22245134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.