These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21982581)

  • 1. Cueing spatial attention through timing and probability.
    Girardi G; Antonucci G; Nico D
    Cortex; 2013 Jan; 49(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 21982581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit attentional orienting in a target detection task with central cues.
    Peterson SA; Gibson TN
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1532-47. PubMed ID: 21807536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occipital-parietal interactions during shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention: trial-dependent changes of effective connectivity.
    Indovina I; Macaluso E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1477-86. PubMed ID: 15707797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An examination of the nature of attentional deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease: evidence from a spatial orienting task.
    Filoteo JV; Delis DC; Salmon DP; Demadura T; Roman MJ; Shults CW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1997 Jul; 3(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9260443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociation of stimulus relevance and saliency factors during shifts of visuospatial attention.
    Indovina I; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1701-11. PubMed ID: 17003078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similar effect of cueing conditions on attentional and saccadic temporal dynamics.
    Filali-Sadouk N; Castet E; Olivier E; Zenon A
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):21.1-13. PubMed ID: 20465340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention to baseline: does orienting visuospatial attention really facilitate target detection?
    Albares M; Criaud M; Wardak C; Nguyen SC; Ben Hamed S; Boulinguez P
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 106(2):809-16. PubMed ID: 21613585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrocortical correlates of control of selective attention to spatial frequency.
    Grent-'t-Jong T; Böcker KB; Kenemans JL
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 16690039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial cueing in time-space synesthetes: An event-related brain potential study.
    Teuscher U; Brang D; Ramachandran VS; Coulson S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Oct; 74(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20637536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The automaticity of vantage point shifts within a synaesthetes' spatial calendar.
    Jarick M; Jensen C; Dixon MJ; Smilek D
    J Neuropsychol; 2011 Sep; 5(2):333-52. PubMed ID: 21923793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.