These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21982588)

  • 1. Waste management project's alternatives: A risk-based multi-criteria assessment (RBMCA) approach.
    Karmperis AC; Sotirchos A; Aravossis K; Tatsiopoulos IP
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jan; 32(1):194-212. PubMed ID: 21982588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Monte Carlo simulation to make better capital investment decisions.
    Gapenski LC
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1990; 35(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 10104380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of investment risk models varies.
    Gapenski LC
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1992 Apr; 46(4):40, 42, 44, passim. PubMed ID: 10145607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties.
    Guo P; Huang GH
    Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 19854040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps.
    Garfì M; Tondelli S; Bonoli A
    Waste Manag; 2009 Oct; 29(10):2729-39. PubMed ID: 19560912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.
    Thorneloe SA; Weitz K; Jambeck J
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1006-20. PubMed ID: 17433663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multi-criteria decision analysis assessment of waste paper management options.
    Hanan D; Burnley S; Cooke D
    Waste Manag; 2013 Mar; 33(3):566-73. PubMed ID: 22784476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste.
    Tavares G; Zsigraiová Z; Semiao V
    Waste Manag; 2011; 31(9-10):1960-72. PubMed ID: 21600754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LCA-IWM: a decision support tool for sustainability assessment of waste management systems.
    den Boer J; den Boer E; Jager J
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1032-45. PubMed ID: 17428653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating multi-criteria decision analysis for a GIS-based hazardous waste landfill sitting in Kurdistan Province, western Iran.
    Sharifi M; Hadidi M; Vessali E; Mosstafakhani P; Taheri K; Shahoie S; Khodamoradpour M
    Waste Manag; 2009 Oct; 29(10):2740-58. PubMed ID: 19477110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision support models for solid waste management: review and game-theoretic approaches.
    Karmperis AC; Aravossis K; Tatsiopoulos IP; Sotirchos A
    Waste Manag; 2013 May; 33(5):1290-301. PubMed ID: 23462269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method.
    Liu HC; Wu J; Li P
    Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2744-51. PubMed ID: 24011433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated assessment of a new Waste-to-Energy facility in Central Greece in the context of regional perspectives.
    Perkoulidis G; Papageorgiou A; Karagiannidis A; Kalogirou S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1395-406. PubMed ID: 20061131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of waste management technology using BATNEEC options, technology quality method and multi-criteria analysis.
    Generowicz A; Kulczycka J; Kowalski Z; Banach M
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Apr; 92(4):1314-20. PubMed ID: 21232845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining multiple quantitative and qualitative goals when assessing biomanufacturing strategies under uncertainty.
    Farid SS; Washbrook J; Titchener-Hooker NJ
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(4):1183-91. PubMed ID: 16080700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to compare alternatives for the long-term management of surplus mercury.
    Randall P; Brown L; Deschaine L; Dimarzio J; Kaiser G; Vierow J
    J Environ Manage; 2004 May; 71(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 15084358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integration of environmental and human health risk assessment for industries using hazardous materials: a quantitative multi criteria approach for environmental decision makers.
    Topuz E; Talinli I; Aydin E
    Environ Int; 2011 Feb; 37(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 21111481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.