499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21982697)
1. Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.
Oberg SA; Christie GJ; Tata MS
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3768-75. PubMed ID: 21982697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Right frontal cortex generates reward-related theta-band oscillatory activity.
Christie GJ; Tata MS
Neuroimage; 2009 Nov; 48(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 19591949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Theta-band oscillatory activity differs between gamblers and nongamblers comorbid with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in a probabilistic reward-learning task.
Abouzari M; Oberg S; Tata M
Behav Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 312():195-200. PubMed ID: 27318102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human oscillatory activity associated to reward processing in a gambling task.
Marco-Pallares J; Cucurell D; Cunillera T; García R; Andrés-Pueyo A; Münte TF; Rodríguez-Fornells A
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 17804025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How bad was it? Differences in the time course of sensitivity to the magnitude of loss in problem gamblers and controls.
Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
Behav Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 247():140-5. PubMed ID: 23538067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feedback related brain activity in a gambling task: a temporal analysis of EEG correlates.
Lucchiari C; Pravettoni G
Scand J Psychol; 2010 Dec; 51(6):449-54. PubMed ID: 20704690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can event-related potentials serve as neural markers for wins, losses, and near-wins in a gambling task? A principal components analysis.
Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 23792216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision making in pathological gambling: a comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls.
Goudriaan AE; Oosterlaan J; de Beurs E; van den Brink W
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):137-51. PubMed ID: 15795140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hypersensitivity to reward in problem gamblers.
Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Trippe RH; Hecht H; Coles MG; Holroyd CB; Miltner WH
Biol Psychiatry; 2010 Apr; 67(8):781-3. PubMed ID: 20044073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
Leng Y; Zhou X
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Loss feedback negativity elicited by single- versus conjoined-feature stimuli.
Liu Y; Gehring WJ
Neuroreport; 2009 Apr; 20(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 19293730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological correlates of near outcome and outcome sequence processing in problem gamblers and controls.
Ulrich N; Hewig J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):379-392. PubMed ID: 29111453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neuroelectric signatures of reward learning and decision-making in the human nucleus accumbens.
Cohen MX; Axmacher N; Lenartz D; Elger CE; Sturm V; Schlaepfer TE
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2009 Jun; 34(7):1649-58. PubMed ID: 19092783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distorted expectancy coding in problem gambling: is the addictive in the anticipation?
van Holst RJ; Veltman DJ; Büchel C; van den Brink W; Goudriaan AE
Biol Psychiatry; 2012 Apr; 71(8):741-8. PubMed ID: 22342105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oscillatory activity and phase-amplitude coupling in the human medial frontal cortex during decision making.
Cohen MX; Elger CE; Fell J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):390-402. PubMed ID: 18510444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feedback and reward processing in high-functioning autism.
Larson MJ; South M; Krauskopf E; Clawson A; Crowley MJ
Psychiatry Res; 2011 May; 187(1-2):198-203. PubMed ID: 21122921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Baseline EEG theta/beta ratio and punishment sensitivity as biomarkers for feedback-related negativity (FRN) and risk-taking.
Massar SA; Rossi V; Schutter DJ; Kenemans JL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Oct; 123(10):1958-65. PubMed ID: 22542439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reward and punishment hyposensitivity in problem gamblers: A study of event-related potentials using a principal components analysis.
Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1295-309. PubMed ID: 25453608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. P300, not feedback error-related negativity, manifests the waiting cost of receiving reward information.
Wang J; Chen J; Lei Y; Li P
Neuroreport; 2014 Sep; 25(13):1044-8. PubMed ID: 25004079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
