These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21983975)

  • 1. Navigation in minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has no advantage in comparison to a conventional minimally invasive implantation.
    Weber P; Utzschneider S; Sadoghi P; Pietschmann MF; Ficklscherer A; Jansson V; Müller PE
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Feb; 132(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 21983975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Minimally Invasive Stryker-Osteonics unicondylar knee prosthesis with metal-backed tibia component: a 5-year follow-up].
    Endres S; Steinheiser E; Wilke A
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 16224679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement.
    Jenny JY; Ciobanu E; Boeri C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():58-62. PubMed ID: 17572633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
    Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
    Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive implantation and computer navigation for a unicondylar knee system.
    Buckup K; Linke LC; Hahne V
    Orthopedics; 2007 Aug; 30(8 Suppl):66-9. PubMed ID: 17824338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases.
    Pandit H; Jenkins C; Gill HS; Barker K; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21282759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?
    Confalonieri N; Manzotti A; Pullen C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():63-7. PubMed ID: 17589366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
    Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Heyse TJ; Efe T; Rumpf S; Schofer MD; Fuchs-Winkelmann S; Schmitt J; Hauk C
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Sep; 131(9):1287-90. PubMed ID: 21331549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without a navigation system.
    Seon JK; Song EK; Park SJ; Yoon TR; Lee KB; Jung ST
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18534460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of implant alignment and early results after minimally invasive vs conventional OrthoPilot-navigated Columbus TKA.
    Lampe F; Bohlen K; Dries SP; Sufi-Siavach A; Hille E
    Orthopedics; 2007 Oct; 30(10 Suppl):S107-11. PubMed ID: 17983109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty--early results of a matched-pair comparison.
    Yang KY; Wang MC; Yeo SJ; Lo NN
    Singapore Med J; 2003 Nov; 44(11):559-62. PubMed ID: 15007494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications.
    Meek RM; Masri BA; Duncan CP
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 15062705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
    Thiengwittayaporn S; Junsee D; Tanavalee A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S27-32. PubMed ID: 20120662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unicondylar knee replacement with a new tensioner device: clinical results of a multicentre study on 168 cases.
    Campbell D; Schuster AJ; Pfluger D; Hoffmann F
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Jun; 130(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 20306198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early complications after minimally invasive mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Song MH; Kim BH; Ahn SJ; Yoo SH; Lee MS
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Dec; 24(8):1281-4. PubMed ID: 19729271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution!
    Luscombe KL; Lim J; Jones PW; White SH
    Int Orthop; 2007 Jun; 31(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 16896865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Unicondylar knee arthroplasty with "Repicci" model].
    Haspl M; Bićanić G; Jelić M; Pećina M
    Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(7-8):172-6. PubMed ID: 16485830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.
    Biasca N; Schneider TO; Bungartz M
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 40(4):537-63, x. PubMed ID: 19773060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional results of navigated minimally invasive and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a comparison in bilateral cases.
    Song EK; Seon JK; Yoon TR; Park SJ; Bae BH; Cho SG
    Orthopedics; 2006 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):S145-7. PubMed ID: 17407943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.