164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21984587)
1. Calibrating predictive model estimates to support personalized medicine.
Jiang X; Osl M; Kim J; Ohno-Machado L
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 21984587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond discrimination: A comparison of calibration methods and clinical usefulness of predictive models of readmission risk.
Walsh CG; Sharman K; Hripcsak G
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Dec; 76():9-18. PubMed ID: 29079501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calibrating predictive model estimates in a distributed network of patient data.
Huang Y; Jiang X; Gabriel RA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2021 May; 117():103758. PubMed ID: 33811986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probability calibration-based prediction of recurrence rate in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Fan S; Zhao Z; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zheng C; Huang X; Yang Z; Xing M; Lu Q; Luo Y
BioData Min; 2021 Aug; 14(1):38. PubMed ID: 34389029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized prediction of intensive care unit discharge after cardiac surgery: development and validation of a Gaussian processes model.
Meyfroidt G; Güiza F; Cottem D; De Becker W; Van Loon K; Aerts JM; Berckmans D; Ramon J; Bruynooghe M; Van den Berghe G
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2011 Oct; 11():64. PubMed ID: 22027016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A discussion of calibration techniques for evaluating binary and categorical predictive models.
Fenlon C; O'Grady L; Doherty ML; Dunnion J
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Jan; 149():107-114. PubMed ID: 29290291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A patient-driven adaptive prediction technique to improve personalized risk estimation for clinical decision support.
Jiang X; Boxwala AA; El-Kareh R; Kim J; Ohno-Machado L
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012 Jun; 19(e1):e137-44. PubMed ID: 22493049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
Nattino G; Pennell ML; Lemeshow S
Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 32134502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrimination and calibration of mortality risk prediction models in interventional cardiology.
Matheny ME; Ohno-Machado L; Resnic FS
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):367-75. PubMed ID: 16198996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Scaling Methods to Obtain Calibrated Probabilities of Activity for Protein-Ligand Predictions.
Mervin LH; Afzal AM; Engkvist O; Bender A
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Oct; 60(10):4546-4559. PubMed ID: 32865408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with mortality in trauma: re-evaluation of the TRISS method using the National Trauma Data Bank.
Millham FH; LaMorte WW
J Trauma; 2004 May; 56(5):1090-6. PubMed ID: 15179251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. I-spline Smoothing for Calibrating Predictive Models.
Wu Y; Jiang X; Kim J; Ohno-Machado L
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc; 2012; 2012():39-46. PubMed ID: 22779048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a comparison of alternative measures of goodness of fit, parameter search strategies and convergence criteria.
Karnon J; Vanni T
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Jan; 29(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 21142278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new test and graphical tool to assess the goodness of fit of logistic regression models.
Nattino G; Finazzi S; Bertolini G
Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(5):709-20. PubMed ID: 26439593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Applying probability calibration to ensemble methods to predict 2-year mortality in patients with DLBCL.
Fan S; Zhao Z; Yu H; Wang L; Zheng C; Huang X; Yang Z; Xing M; Lu Q; Luo Y
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Jan; 21(1):14. PubMed ID: 33413321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the calibration of classification models from first principles.
Dreiseitl S; Osl M
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2012; 2012():164-9. PubMed ID: 23304285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A two-phase approach to re-calibrating expensive computer simulation for sex-specific colorectal neoplasia development modeling.
Vivas-Valencia C; Zhou Y; Sai A; Imperiale TF; Kong N
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36117168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.
Gupta R; Arora VK
Indian J Med Res; 2004 Jun; 119(6):273-82. PubMed ID: 15243165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited.
Kramer AA; Zimmerman JE
Crit Care Med; 2007 Sep; 35(9):2052-6. PubMed ID: 17568333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
Joslyn LR; Kirschner DE; Linderman JJ
Cell Mol Bioeng; 2021 Feb; 14(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 33643465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
