These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21984818)

  • 1. Independent mechanisms for bright and dark image features in a stereo correspondence task.
    Read JC; Vaz XA; Serrano-Pedraza I
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 21984818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Cumming BG; Read JC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004906. PubMed ID: 27196696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective biasing of stereo correspondence in an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 15610751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of decorrelation on 3-D grating detection with static and dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Palmisano S; Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 16307771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Cumming BG; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-attentive segmentation and correspondence in stereo.
    Zhaoping L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Dec; 357(1428):1877-83. PubMed ID: 12626021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychophysics of stereopsis can be explained without invoking independent ON and OFF channels.
    Read JCA; Cumming BG
    J Vis; 2019 Jun; 19(6):7. PubMed ID: 31173632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Luminance spatial scale and local stereo-sensitivity.
    Hess RF; Liu CH; Wang YZ
    Vision Res; 2002 Feb; 42(3):331-42. PubMed ID: 11809485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for relative disparity matching in the perception of an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Hibbard PB
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):35. PubMed ID: 21047767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human stereovision without localized image features.
    Arndt PA; Mallot HA; Bülthoff HH
    Biol Cybern; 1995; 72(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 7748958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal dynamics of stereo correspondence bi-stability.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3575-85. PubMed ID: 16879853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constraints on human stereo dot matching.
    Harris JM; Parker AJ
    Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(20):2761-72. PubMed ID: 7975312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(34):8967-76. PubMed ID: 27559177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The 'uniqueness constraint' and binocular masking.
    McKee SP; Bravo MJ; Smallman HS; Legge GE
    Perception; 1995; 24(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 7617418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disparity and shading cues cooperate for surface interpolation.
    Vuong QC; Domini F; Caudek C
    Perception; 2006; 35(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 16583761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereo dynamics are not scale-dependent.
    Hess RF; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1911-23. PubMed ID: 16469355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial frequency integration for binocular correspondence in macaque area V4.
    Kumano H; Tanabe S; Fujita I
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):402-8. PubMed ID: 17959744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency.
    Peterzell DH; Serrano-Pedraza I; Widdall M; Read JCA
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A psychophysical and computational analysis of intensity-based stereo.
    Mallot HA; Arndt PA; Bülthoff HH
    Biol Cybern; 1996 Sep; 75(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 8974467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional selection in judgments of stereo depth.
    Farell B; Ng CJ
    Vision Res; 2019 May; 158():19-30. PubMed ID: 30771360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.