321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21985642)
1. Stereoscopic technique for conversion of radiographic guide into implant surgical guide.
Chan PW; Chik FF; Pow EH; Chow TW
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):613-24. PubMed ID: 21985642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of implant placement in the posterior maxilla as related to 2 types of surgical guides: a pilot study in the human cadaver.
Noharet R; Pettersson A; Bourgeois D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):526-32. PubMed ID: 24721507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel conversion method for radiographic guide into surgical guide.
Peng YT; Tseng CC; Du YC; Chen YN; Chang CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):447-457. PubMed ID: 28078781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques.
Reyes A; Turkyilmaz I; Prihoda TJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 25681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of a computer-aided implant surgical technique.
Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Calasso S
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 23593625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study.
Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Guerrero ME; Hirsch E; Schutyser F; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 34(9):816-21. PubMed ID: 17716317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of two stereolithographic surgical templates: a retrospective study.
Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Calasso S; Barbato E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):448-59. PubMed ID: 21745330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery on plastic models.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1472-8. PubMed ID: 24993374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
