These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2198608)
1. Time courses in visual-information processing: some theoretical considerations. Hagenzieker MP; van der Heijden AH Psychol Res; 1990; 52(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 2198608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time courses in visual-information processing: some empirical evidence for inhibition. Hagenzieker MP; van der Heijden AH; Hagenaar R Psychol Res; 1990; 52(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 2377720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bloch's law and the dynamics of feature fusion. Scharnowski F; Hermens F; Herzog MH Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2444-52. PubMed ID: 17675130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dips and bumps: on Bloch's law and the Broca-Sulzer phenomenon. Gorea A; Tyler CW Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Apr; 110(15):E1330. PubMed ID: 23493548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual search, visual streams, and visual architectures. Green M Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct; 50(4):388-403. PubMed ID: 1758771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shapes displayed with durations in the microsecond range do not obey Bloch's law of temporal summation. Greene E; Ogden RT Iperception; 2013; 4(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 24349700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Mangun GR Psychophysiology; 1995 Jan; 32(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 7878167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A unified model for the combined temporal and spatial Broca-Sulzer effect. Berman SM; Stewart AL Biol Cybern; 1979 Oct; 34(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 486595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Hegdé J Prog Neurobiol; 2008 Apr; 84(4):405-39. PubMed ID: 17976895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mach bands as empirically derived associations. Lotto RB; Williams SM; Purves D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 Apr; 96(9):5245-50. PubMed ID: 10220451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ambiguity and invariance: two fundamental challenges for visual processing. Rust NC; Stocker AA Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2010 Jun; 20(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 20545020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Koch C; Ullman S Hum Neurobiol; 1985; 4(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 3836989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anchoring visual subjective experience in a neural model: the coarse vividness hypothesis. Campana F; Tallon-Baudry C Neuropsychologia; 2013 May; 51(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 23499720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of attention and arousal on early responses in striate cortex. Poghosyan V; Shibata T; Ioannides AA Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Jul; 22(1):225-34. PubMed ID: 16029212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The neural basis of visual selective attention: a commentary on Harter and Aine. Hillyard SA; Mangun GR Biol Psychol; 1986 Dec; 23(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 3828423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An empirical basis for Mach bands. Lotto RB; Williams SM; Purves D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 Apr; 96(9):5239-44. PubMed ID: 10220450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond the forest and the trees: local and global interference in hierarchical visual stimuli containing three levels. Rijpkema M; van Aalderen S; Schwarzbach J; Verstraten FA Perception; 2007; 36(8):1115-22. PubMed ID: 17972477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]