These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21986367)

  • 1. The right hemisphere advantage in visual change detection depends on temporal factors.
    Spotorno S; Faure S
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 21986367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric asymmetries for temporal information processing: transient detection versus sustained monitoring.
    Okubo M; Nicholls ME
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Mar; 66(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 17706333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Change detection in complex scenes: hemispheric contribution and the role of perceptual and semantic factors.
    Spotorno S; Faure S
    Perception; 2011; 40(1):5-22. PubMed ID: 21513180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maintaining perceptual constancy while remaining vigilant: left hemisphere change blindness and right hemisphere vigilance.
    Vos L; Whitman D
    Laterality; 2014; 19(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 23574348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric differences for visual matrix processing: stimulus size and spatial frequency effects.
    Pedersen HK; Polich J
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):525-38. PubMed ID: 11748906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits.
    Poynter W; Ingram P; Minor S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing.
    Peyrin C; Mermillod M; Chokron S; Marendaz C
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16837115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural correlates of the left-visual-field superiority in face perception appear at multiple stages of face processing.
    Yovel G; Levy J; Grabowecky M; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):462-74. PubMed ID: 12729496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative and qualitative hemispheric asymmetry for processing Japanese kana.
    Hellige JB; Yamauchi M
    Brain Cogn; 1999 Aug; 40(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 10415131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic category effects modulate visual priming in neglect patients.
    Viggiano MP; Marzi T; Forni M; Righi S; Franceschini R; Peru A
    Cortex; 2012 Oct; 48(9):1128-37. PubMed ID: 21757194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME; Wood AG
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex differences in face processing: Are women less lateralized and faster than men?
    Godard O; Fiori N
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 20621740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible contrast gain control in the right hemisphere.
    Okubo M; Nicholls ME
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 16169137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Salience-based progression of visual attention.
    Michael GA; Gálvez-García G
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 224(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 21658415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Different magnitude representations in left and right hemisphere: evidence from the visual half field technique.
    Notebaert K; Reynvoet B
    Laterality; 2009 May; 14(3):228-45. PubMed ID: 18792837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateralization of spatial rather than temporal attention underlies the left hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Asanowicz D; Kruse L; Śmigasiewicz K; Verleger R
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Nov; 118():54-62. PubMed ID: 28797898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric asymmetry in stimulus size evaluation.
    Szatkowska I; Grabowska A; Nowicka A
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1993; 53(1):257-62. PubMed ID: 8317256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1576-82. PubMed ID: 15601520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: effects of stimulus and task factors.
    Yovel G; Levy J; Yovel I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1369-85. PubMed ID: 11766931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.