These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21986796)

  • 1. Estimation of 3D shape, internal density and mechanics of proximal femur by combining bone mineral density images with shape and density templates.
    Väänänen SP; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jul; 11(6):791-800. PubMed ID: 21986796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image.
    Väänänen SP; Isaksson H; Julkunen P; Sirola J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 20809392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur.
    Langton CM; Pisharody S; Keyak JH
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 19230742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of the fracture load of whole proximal femur specimens by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in DXA-scan images.
    Boehm HF; Horng A; Notohamiprodjo M; Eckstein F; Burklein D; Panteleon A; Lutz J; Reiser M
    Bone; 2008 Nov; 43(5):826-31. PubMed ID: 18723137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image.
    Langton CM; Pisharody S; Keyak JH
    Osteoporos Int; 2009 Mar; 20(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 18563512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur.
    Lochmüller EM; Miller P; Bürklein D; Wehr U; Rambeck W; Eckstein F
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 10928227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Whitmarsh T; Humbert L; De Craene M; Del Rio Barquero LM; Frangi AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2101-14. PubMed ID: 21803681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
    Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
    Bone; 2012 Oct; 51(4):737-40. PubMed ID: 22796418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.
    Huber MB; Carballido-Gamio J; Bauer JS; Baum T; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Link TM
    Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):472-81. PubMed ID: 18430879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.
    Pisharody S; Phillips R; Langton CM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 18491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical note: comparison between single and multiview simulated DXA configurations for reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur.
    Humbert L; Whitmarsh T; Craene MD; Del Río Barquero LM; Frangi AF
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5272-6. PubMed ID: 22894452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of the vertebral body: an in vitro study.
    Tabensky AD; Williams J; DeLuca V; Briganti E; Seeman E
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Dec; 11(12):1981-8. PubMed ID: 8970902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
    Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength.
    Carpenter RD; Beaupré GS; Lang TF; Orwoll ES; Carter DR;
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1533-42. PubMed ID: 16059625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Premenopausal and postmenopausal changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Ravn P; Hetland ML; Overgaard K; Christiansen C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1975-80. PubMed ID: 7872064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
    Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone mineral density and singh index predict bone mechanical properties of human femur.
    D'Amelio P; Rossi P; Isaia G; Lollino N; Castoldi F; Girardo M; Dettoni F; Sattin F; Delise M; Bignardi C
    Connect Tissue Res; 2008; 49(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 18382896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.