These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21987123)

  • 101. Selective retrieval in categorized lists: Detrimental, neutral, and beneficial effects on nonretrieved items.
    Bäuml KT; Wallner L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1372-1386. PubMed ID: 31697144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Overcoming fixation with repeated memory suppression.
    Angello G; Storm BC; Smith SM
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 24575886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. Inhibition-induced forgetting: when more control leads to less memory.
    Chiu YC; Egner T
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 25398560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. Compound cuing in free recall.
    Lohnas LJ; Kahana MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 23957364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. Response suppression contributes to recency in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1070-80. PubMed ID: 22555889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. Different reactivation procedures enable or prevent episodic memory updating.
    Scully ID; Hupbach A
    Hippocampus; 2020 Aug; 30(8):806-814. PubMed ID: 31520566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. Retrieval-induced forgetting in children and adolescents with and without obesity.
    Davidson TL; Ramirez E; Kwarteng EA; Djan KG; Faulkner LM; Parker MN; Yang SB; Zenno A; Kelly NR; Shank LM; Tanofsky-Kraff M; Snelling A; Belson SI; Hyde A; Chen KY; Yanovski JA
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2022 Apr; 46(4):851-858. PubMed ID: 35042933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. Foraging for thought: an inhibition-of-return-like effect resulting from directing attention within working memory.
    Johnson MR; Higgins JA; Norman KA; Sederberg PB; Smith TA; Johnson MK
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1104-12. PubMed ID: 23653128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. Thinking about a limited future enhances the positivity of younger and older adults' recall: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory.
    Barber SJ; Opitz PC; Martins B; Sakaki M; Mather M
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 27112461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. Dissociating early- and late-selection processes in recall: the mixed blessing of categorized study lists.
    Guzel MA; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jul; 41(5):683-97. PubMed ID: 23322359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. Training forgetting of negative material in depression.
    Joormann J; Hertel PT; LeMoult J; Gotlib IH
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2009 Feb; 118(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 19222312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. Are forward and backward recall the same? A dual-task study of digit recall.
    St Clair-Thompson HL; Allen RJ
    Mem Cognit; 2013 May; 41(4):519-32. PubMed ID: 23263876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved.
    Fellers C; Storm BC
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Aug; 52(6):1325-1337. PubMed ID: 38480606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. On the role of inhibition in suppression-induced forgetting.
    van Schie K; Fawcett JM; Anderson MC
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4242. PubMed ID: 36918620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. Adaptive and qualitative changes in encoding strategy with experience: evidence from the test-expectancy paradigm.
    Finley JR; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):632-52. PubMed ID: 22103783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. Two replications of Wiechert et al.'s (2023) online Think/No-Think study in undergraduate students.
    Wessel I; Lehmann R; Wiechert S
    Memory; 2024 Oct; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 39383331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. Within-pair factors might explain the inconsistent effects of animacy on paired-associates recall.
    Serra MJ; DeYoung CM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Apr; 30(2):688-699. PubMed ID: 36127492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. On the importance of looking back: the role of recursive remindings in recency judgments and cued recall.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jul; 41(5):625-37. PubMed ID: 23371792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. Internal reinstatement hides cuing effects in source memory tasks.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):953-66. PubMed ID: 23666645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. Can't stop thinking: The role of cognitive control in suppression-induced forgetting.
    Chen S; Mao X; Wu Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Jul; 172():108274. PubMed ID: 35623449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.