These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21988276)
1. On keeping your enemies close: powerful leaders seek proximity to ingroup power threats. Mead NL; Maner JK J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 102(3):576-91. PubMed ID: 21988276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The essential tension between leadership and power: when leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Maner JK; Mead NL J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):482-97. PubMed ID: 20649369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A double standard when group members behave badly: transgression credit to ingroup leaders. Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G; Travaglino GA J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):799-815. PubMed ID: 23895265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Divide and conquer: when and why leaders undermine the cohesive fabric of their group. Case CR; Maner JK J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Dec; 107(6):1033-50. PubMed ID: 25437135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members. Paladino MP; Castelli L Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):755-68. PubMed ID: 18388255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defensive helping: threat to group identity, ingroup identification, status stability, and common group identity as determinants of intergroup help-giving. Nadler A; Harpaz-Gorodeisky G; Ben-David Y J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):823-34. PubMed ID: 19857004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas: behavioral antecedents and consequences of prestige and dominance. Halevy N; Chou EY; Cohen TR; Livingston RW J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Feb; 102(2):351-66. PubMed ID: 21928914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A change will do us good: threats diminish typical preferences for male leaders. Brown ER; Diekman AB; Schneider MC Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 37(7):930-41. PubMed ID: 21467539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Duckitt J Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 32(5):684-96. PubMed ID: 16702160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity. Gómez A; Dovidio JF; Huici C; Gaertner SL; Cuadrado I Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1613-26. PubMed ID: 18832337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fewer but better: Proportionate size of the group affects evaluation of transgressive leaders. Travaglino GA; Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G; Yetkili O Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 55(2):318-36. PubMed ID: 26334165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How leaders self-regulate their task performance: evidence that power promotes diligence, depletion, and disdain. DeWall CN; Baumeister RF; Mead NL; Vohs KD J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Jan; 100(1):47-65. PubMed ID: 20919772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Sullivan D; Landau MJ; Branscombe NR; Rothschild ZK J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Apr; 102(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 22229457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex differences in the emergence of leadership during competitions within and between groups. Van Vugt M; Spisak BR Psychol Sci; 2008 Sep; 19(9):854-8. PubMed ID: 18947349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceiving your group's future to be in jeopardy: extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup. Wohl MJ; Branscombe NR; Reysen S Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 36(7):898-910. PubMed ID: 20519571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disruptive effects of vigilance on dominant group members' treatment of outgroup members: choking versus shining under pressure. Vorauer JD; Turpie CA J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Sep; 87(3):384-99. PubMed ID: 15382987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting threatened identity: sticking with the group by emphasizing ingroup heterogeneity. Hutchison P; Jetten J; Christian J; Haycraft E Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1620-32. PubMed ID: 17122175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Power in stereotypically masculine domains: a Social Influence Strategy X Stereotype Match model. Vescio TK; Snyder M; Butz DA J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Dec; 85(6):1062-78. PubMed ID: 14674814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: an identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Hornsey MJ; Imani A Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Mar; 30(3):365-83. PubMed ID: 15030626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A joke is just a joke (except when it isn't): cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives. Hodson G; Rush J; Macinnis CC J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Oct; 99(4):660-82. PubMed ID: 20919777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]