These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21988376)

  • 21. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of word position on eye-movements in sentence and paragraph reading.
    Kuperman V; Dambacher M; Nuthmann A; Kliegl R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Sep; 63(9):1838-57. PubMed ID: 20373225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: further evidence from eye movements.
    Chamberland C; Saint-Aubin J; Légère MA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 22686151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimal viewing position effects in the processing of isolated Chinese words.
    Liu P; Li X
    Vision Res; 2013 Apr; 81():45-57. PubMed ID: 23416868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):954-9. PubMed ID: 16262491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dissociating spatial and letter-based word length effects observed in readers' eye movement patterns.
    Hautala J; Hyönä J; Aro M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1719-27. PubMed ID: 21664920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
    White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Eye movement correlates of acquired central dyslexia.
    Schattka KI; Radach R; Huber W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2959-73. PubMed ID: 20547168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Processing the in the parafovea: are articles skipped automatically?
    Angele B; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):649-62. PubMed ID: 22799285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality.
    White SJ; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):603-17. PubMed ID: 21910560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of a word's number of letters, spatial extent, and initial bigram characteristics on eye movement control during reading: Evidence from Arabic.
    Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):451-471. PubMed ID: 27893224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Decision and metrics of refixations in reading isolated words.
    Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Doré-Mazars K
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):2009-17. PubMed ID: 15149834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences.
    Yen MH; Radach R; Tzeng OJ; Hung DL; Tsai JL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 19285294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.