572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21988504)
1. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation.
Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):455-65. PubMed ID: 23772828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.
Sheikh Rashid M; Leensen MCJ; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):844-853. PubMed ID: 28587489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA; de Laat JAPM
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the sensitivity of speech-in-noise tests for noise-induced hearing loss.
Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 24237040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test.
Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 23782715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
Wilson RH; McArdle R
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss].
Moreira RR; Ferreira Junior M
Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15609584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of a smartphone-based digits-in-noise hearing test in South African English.
Potgieter JM; Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Hopper TC; Smits C
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 27121117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests.
van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Brand T; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
