These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21988752)

  • 1. Identification of Mendelian inconsistencies between SNP and pedigree information of sibs.
    Calus MP; Mulder HA; Bastiaansen JW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Oct; 43(1):34. PubMed ID: 21988752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of using opposing homozygotes for paternity testing in Japanese Black cattle.
    Komiya R; Ogawa S; Aonuma T; Satoh M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 Jan; 139(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 34499371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of recombination events, haplotype reconstruction and imputation of sires using half-sib SNP genotypes.
    Ferdosi MH; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JH; Gondro C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):11. PubMed ID: 24495596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panels.
    Lopes MS; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Duijvesteijn N; Lopes PS; Guimarães SE; Knol EF
    BMC Genet; 2013 Sep; 14():92. PubMed ID: 24063757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.
    Douglas JA; Skol AD; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):487-95. PubMed ID: 11791214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic use of the genomic relationship matrix to validate and discover livestock pedigrees.
    Moore KL; Vilela C; Kaseja K; Mrode R; Coffey M
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 30329120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of molecular markers to improve relationship information in the genetic evaluation of beef cattle tick resistance under pedigree-based models.
    Junqueira VS; Cardoso FF; Oliveira MM; Sollero BP; Silva FF; Lopes PS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Feb; 134(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 27658502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information.
    Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):377-88. PubMed ID: 22192217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations.
    Nirea KG; Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Oct; 44(1):30. PubMed ID: 23110512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
    Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring unknown genotypes of sires at codominant deoxyribonucleic acid markers in half-sib families.
    Gomez-Raya L
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1872-82. PubMed ID: 19251934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Weighting genomic and genealogical information for genetic parameter estimation and breeding value prediction in tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):612-617. PubMed ID: 29385460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short communication: relationship of call rate and accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in dairy cattle.
    Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3336-9. PubMed ID: 23497995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
    Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
    Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current status of genomic evaluation.
    Misztal I; Lourenco D; Legarra A
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32267923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.