243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21989784)
1. Surgical technique: Porous tantalum reconstruction for destructive nonprimary periacetabular tumors.
Khan FA; Rose PS; Yanagisawa M; Lewallen DG; Sim FH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):594-601. PubMed ID: 21989784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LUMiC
Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup.
Del Gaizo DJ; Kancherla V; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 22090355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical technique: a cup-in-cup technique to restore offset in severe protrusio acetabular defects.
Blumenfeld TJ; Bargar WL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 21915769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Constrained total hip megaprosthesis for primary periacetabular tumors.
Ueda T; Kakunaga S; Takenaka S; Araki N; Yoshikawa H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Mar; 471(3):741-9. PubMed ID: 23054518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome of Patients Treated With Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants for Neoplastic Periacetabular Lesions.
Houdek MT; Abdel MP; Perry KI; Salduz A; Rose PS; Sim FH; Lewallen DG
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Mar; 28(6):256-262. PubMed ID: 31305354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 19582528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants and Harrington Reconstruction for Metastatic Disease of the Acetabulum.
Houdek MT; Ferguson PC; Abdel MP; Griffin AM; Hevesi M; Perry KI; Rose PS; Wunder JS; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jul; 102(14):1239-1247. PubMed ID: 32675673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?
Jafari SM; Bender B; Coyle C; Parvizi J; Sharkey PF; Hozack WJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 19809857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acetabular Reconstruction With Femoral Head Autograft After Intraarticular Resection of Periacetabular Tumors is Durable at Short-term Followup.
Tang X; Guo W; Yang R; Yan T; Tang S; Li D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3060-3070. PubMed ID: 28948491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions.
Civinini R; Carulli C; Matassi F; Nistri L; Innocenti M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3542-8. PubMed ID: 22700131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second-generation modular acetabular components provide fixation at 10 to 16 years.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 21691908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporary External Fixation Can Stabilize Hip Transposition Arthroplasty After Resection of Malignant Periacetabular Bone Tumors.
Kunisada T; Fujiwara T; Hasei J; Nakata E; Senda M; Ozaki T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 477(8):1892-1901. PubMed ID: 30985613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periacetabular Metastatic Disease. An Original Technique of Reconstruction According to the Harrington Classification.
Wegrzyn J; Malatray M; Al-Qahtani T; Pibarot V; Confavreux C; Freyer G
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2546-2555. PubMed ID: 29656965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of porous tantalum acetabular components for Paprosky type 3 and 4 acetabular defects.
Batuyong ED; Brock HS; Thiruvengadam N; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB; Huddleston JI
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1318-22. PubMed ID: 24405625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions.
Moličnik A; Hanc M; Rečnik G; Krajnc Z; Rupreht M; Fokter SK
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Aug; 24(6):911-7. PubMed ID: 24241214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early Results of Acetabular Reconstruction After Wide Periacetabular Oncologic Resection.
Abdel MP; von Roth P; Perry KI; Rose PS; Lewallen DG; Sim FH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Feb; 99(3):e9. PubMed ID: 28145959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
