BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21991574)

  • 1. The relationship between pressure and volume when using Rapid Rhino(r) packs in the management of epistaxis.
    Mackeith S; Hettige R; Falzon A; Draper M
    Rhinology; 2011 Oct; 49(4):470-3. PubMed ID: 21991574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid Rhino nasal packs: demonstration of depressurisation but not deflation.
    Smyth C; Hanna B; Scally C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):522-7. PubMed ID: 18926004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study to determine the benefits of bilateral versus unilateral nasal packing with Rapid Rhino ® packs.
    Hettige R; Mackeith S; Falzon A; Draper M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 271(3):519-23. PubMed ID: 23765062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid Rhino versus Merocel nasal packs in septal surgery.
    Hesham A; Ghali A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Dec; 125(12):1244-6. PubMed ID: 21854674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intranasal packs and haemostatic agents for the management of adult epistaxis: systematic review.
    Iqbal IZ; Jones GH; Dawe N; Mamais C; Smith ME; Williams RJ; Kuhn I; Carrie S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Dec; 131(12):1065-1092. PubMed ID: 29280695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea after nasal packing for epistaxis: case report.
    Edkins O; Nyamarebvu CT; Lubbe D
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Apr; 126(4):421-3. PubMed ID: 22361138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of side effects and patient perceptions towards Rapid Rhino and Merocel packs in epistaxis.
    Mettias B; Karia CT; Irvine E; Conboy P
    J Laryngol Otol; 2024 Jun; 138(6):642-646. PubMed ID: 38230503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Swallowed nasal pack: a rare but serious complication of the management of epistaxis.
    Hashmi SM; Gopaul SR; Prinsley PR; Sansom JR
    J Laryngol Otol; 2004 May; 118(5):372-3. PubMed ID: 15165314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A meta-analysis compare rapid rhino with merocel for nasal packing].
    Yang X; Yi K; Tian J; Guo Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 26(14):655-60. PubMed ID: 23156811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of nasal tampons for the treatment of epistaxis in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.
    Singer AJ; Blanda M; Cronin K; LoGiudice-Khwaja M; Gulla J; Bradshaw J; Katz A
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Feb; 45(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15671968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid Rhino: A new pneumatic nasal tamponade for posterior epistaxis.
    Gudziol V; Mewes T; Mann WJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Jan; 132(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 15632931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel and RapidRhino packing in the management of anterior epistaxis.
    Badran K; Malik TH; Belloso A; Timms MS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 30(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 16209675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nasal Packs for Epistaxis: Predictors of Success.
    INTEGRATE (The UK ENT Trainee Research Network)
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 45(5):659-666. PubMed ID: 32306506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis.
    Moumoulidis I; Draper MR; Patel H; Jani P; Price T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 263(8):719-22. PubMed ID: 16685543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Nasal packing in posterior epistaxis. Comparison of two methods].
    García Callejo FJ; Muñoz Fernández N; Achiques Martínez MT; Frías Moya-Angeler S; Montoro Elena MJ; Algarra JM
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2010; 61(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 20137770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The combined use of two RapidRhino packs instead of anteroposterior packing for the control of severe epistaxis.
    Kousoulis P; Hajiioannou J; Konstandinidis G
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Nov; 121(11):2394-5. PubMed ID: 21993697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of surgical audit in improving patient management; nasal haemorrhage: an audit study.
    Upile T; Jerjes W; Sipaul F; El Maaytah M; Nouraei SA; Singh S; Hopper C; Wright A
    BMC Surg; 2007 Sep; 7():19. PubMed ID: 17854499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transport of a patient with massive traumatic epistaxis using a cricket helmet and posterior nasal packing.
    Alexander PV; Walters A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2009 Jun; 88(6):967-8. PubMed ID: 19517403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Duration of nasal packs in the management of epistaxis.
    Kundi NA; Raza M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 25772962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improvising a Posterior Nasal Pack with Equipment in a Basic First Aid Kit.
    Royer AK; Royer MC
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2016 Sep; 27(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 27473927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.