2776 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21992372)
1. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response of lithium formate EPR dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy.
Adolfsson E; Carlsson GA; Grindborg JE; Gustafsson H; Lund E; Carlsson Tedgren A
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4946-59. PubMed ID: 20964214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of the intrinsic energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters for 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy sources relative to 60Co.
Reed JL; Rasmussen BE; Davis SD; Micka JA; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122103. PubMed ID: 25471976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Track-average LET of secondary electrons generated in LiF:Mg,Ti and liquid water by 20-300 kV x-ray,
Cabrera-Santiago A; Massillon-Jl G
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(22):7919-7933. PubMed ID: 27779122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of phantom materials on the energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters exposed to 20-300 kV narrow x-ray spectra, 137Cs and 60Co photons.
Massillon-J L G; Cabrera-Santiago A; Minniti R; O'Brien M; Soares CG
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4149-66. PubMed ID: 25004055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) for Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance.
Liuzzi R; Savino F; D'Avino V; Pugliese M; Cella L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139287. PubMed ID: 26427065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of improved TLD dosimetry on the determination of dose rate constants for (125)I and (103)Pd brachytherapy seeds.
Rodriguez M; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):114301. PubMed ID: 25370677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks.
Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of a synthetic diamond detector response in kilovoltage photon beams.
Kaveckyte V; Persson L; Malusek A; Benmakhlouf H; Alm Carlsson G; Carlsson Tedgren Å
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1268-1279. PubMed ID: 31880809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
Hauri P; Schneider U
Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microdosimetric interpretation of the photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti detectors.
Olko P; Bilski P; Kim JL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):119-22. PubMed ID: 12382842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the energy-response factor of LiF and Al2O3 in radiotherapy beams.
Mobit P; Agyingi E; Sandison G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):497-9. PubMed ID: 16735558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence detectors and high-sensitivity MCP-N thermoluminescent detectors in the 40-300 kVp energy range.
Poirier Y; Kuznetsova S; Villarreal-Barajas JE
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):402-413. PubMed ID: 29164632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
