195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21992384)
1. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
Popescu LM
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
Khurd P; Liu B; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.
Chakraborty DP; Zhai X
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2548. PubMed ID: 27147365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT image assessment by low contrast signal detectability evaluation with unknown signal location.
Popescu LM; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111908. PubMed ID: 24320441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility as a rationale for choosing observer performance assessment paradigms for detection tasks in medical imaging.
Wunderlich A; Abbey CK
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111903. PubMed ID: 24320436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model for the detection of signals in images with multiple suspicious locations.
Popescu LM
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5565-74. PubMed ID: 19175114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
Zanca F; Hillis SL; Claus F; Van Ongeval C; Celis V; Provoost V; Yoon HJ; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A nonparametric procedure for comparing the areas under correlated LROC curves.
Wunderlich A; Noo F
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Nov; 31(11):2050-61. PubMed ID: 22736638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
Chakraborty DP; Winter LH
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Song T; Gur D
Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 18479482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.
Edwards DC; Kupinski MA; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2861-70. PubMed ID: 12512721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ROC, LROC, FROC, AFROC: an alphabet soup.
He X; Frey E
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):652-5. PubMed ID: 19720362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ROC and LROC analyses of the effects of lesion contrast, size, and signal-to-noise ratio on detectability in PET images.
Farquhar TH; Llacer J; Sayre J; Tai YC; Hoffman EJ
J Nucl Med; 2000 Apr; 41(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 10768578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonparametric ROC and LROC analysis.
Popescu LM
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1556-64. PubMed ID: 17555237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.
Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 1989; 16(4):561-8. PubMed ID: 2770630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images.
Swensson RG
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1709-25. PubMed ID: 8946368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in free-response detection-localization tasks using ROC tools.
Bandos AI; Obuchowski NA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1808-1825. PubMed ID: 29921163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
