These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores. Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy. Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of a tertiary Gleason pattern 4 or 5 on clinical failure and mortality after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer. Servoll E; Saeter T; Vlatkovic L; Lund T; Nesland J; Waaler G; Axcrona K; Beisland HO BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(10):1489-94. PubMed ID: 21933333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate-risk disease. Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Metcalfe C; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ; Gleave ME BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 22257140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence. O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence. Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Importance of margin extent as a predictor of outcome after adjuvant radiotherapy for Gleason score 7 pT3N0 prostate cancer. Valicenti RK; Chervoneva I; Gomella LG Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1093-7. PubMed ID: 15001249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report. Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features. Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer. Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score. Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]