1795 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21992536)
21. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
Saether T; Sørlien LT; Viset T; Lydersen S; Angelsen A
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
Kausik SJ; Blute ML; Sebo TJ; Leibovich BC; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Zincke H
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Isolated local recurrence is rare after radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancer and positive surgical margins: therapeutic implications.
Han M; Pound CR; Potter SR; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):864-6. PubMed ID: 11176487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with a positive surgical margin.
Leibovich BC; Engen DE; Patterson DE; Pisansky TM; Alexander EE; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1178-82. PubMed ID: 10737490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk stratification of patients with extraprostatic extension and negative lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: identifying optimal candidates for adjuvant therapy.
Eisenberg MS; Karnes RJ; Kaushik D; Rangel L; Bergstralh EJ; Boorjian SA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1735-41. PubMed ID: 23727312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Implications of adjuvant treatment].
Fagundo EV; Amo FH; López EL; Sánchez JP; Jiménez Gdel P; Chamizo JA; Cordero JM; Fernández ME; Fernández CH
Arch Esp Urol; 2012; 65(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 22318186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Importance of Reporting the Gleason Score at the Positive Surgical Margin Site: Analysis of 4,082 Consecutive Radical Prostatectomy Cases.
Kates M; Sopko NA; Han M; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2016 Feb; 195(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 26264998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Godoy G; Tareen BU; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1610-4. PubMed ID: 19549257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome.
Vrang ML; Røder MA; Vainer B; Christensen IJ; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Iversen P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 46(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 22320899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.
Budäus L; Isbarn H; Eichelberg C; Lughezzani G; Sun M; Perrotte P; Chun FK; Salomon G; Steuber T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 20723925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity.
Williams SB; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1734-40. PubMed ID: 20942827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
