1000 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21993047)
1. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Elangovan S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
Wilson RH; Cates WB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.
Sheft S; Shafiro V; Lorenzi C; McMullen R; Farrell C
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 22790319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity.
Snell KB; Mapes FM; Hickman ED; Frisina DR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):720-7. PubMed ID: 12186051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
Heeke P; Vermiglio AJ; Bulla E; Velappan K; Fang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mild-Gain Hearing Aids as a Treatment for Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.
Roup CM; Post E; Lewis J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):477-494. PubMed ID: 29863462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Onset-Offset N1-P2 Cortical Auditory Evoked Response in Individuals With High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Responses to High- and Low-Frequency Narrowband Noise.
Gonzalez JE; Musiek FE
Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):359-369. PubMed ID: 35436425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Midfrequency dysfunction in listeners having high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Humes LE
J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 6645468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of speech material on the benefit of temporal fine structure information in speech for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired participants.
Lunner T; Hietkamp RK; Andersen MR; Hopkins K; Moore BC
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 22246137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
Souza PE; Turner CW
J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Moore BC; Glasberg BR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11519575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
