These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21993895)

  • 21. Automatic atherosclerotic heart disease detection in intracoronary optical coherence tomography images.
    Xu M; Cheng J; Wong DW; Taruya A; Tanaka A; Liu J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():174-7. PubMed ID: 25569925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel approach for quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: high inter-observer agreement with computer-assisted contour detection.
    Tanimoto S; Rodriguez-Granillo G; Barlis P; de Winter S; Bruining N; Hamers R; Knappen M; Verheye S; Serruys PW; Regar E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Aug; 72(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 18324698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Higher-order regression three-dimensional motion-compensation method for real-time optical coherence tomography volumetric imaging of the cornea.
    Zuo R; Irsch K; Kang JU
    J Biomed Opt; 2022 Jun; 27(6):. PubMed ID: 35751143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Echoes from Picasso: Explanation of an unusual artefact in optical coherence tomography.
    Chu M; van Soest G; Martínez-Hervás-Alonso MÁ; Reisbeck B; Gutiérrez-Chico JL
    Cardiol J; 2020; 27(1):83-84. PubMed ID: 32103479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retrospective image-based gating of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: implications for quantitative analysis.
    Sihan K; Botha C; Post F; de Winter S; Gonzalo N; Regar E; Serruys PW; Hamers R; Bruining N
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Apr; 6(9):1098-103. PubMed ID: 21518683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Serial Assessment of Strut Coverage of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent at 1, 2, and 3 Months After Stent Implantation by Optical Frequency Domain Imaging: The DISCOVERY 1TO3 Study (Evaluation With OFDI of Strut Coverage of Terumo New Drug Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer at 1, 2, and 3 Months).
    Chevalier B; Smits PC; Carrié D; Mehilli J; Van Boven AJ; Regar E; Sawaya FJ; Chamié D; Kraaijeveld AO; Hovasse T; Vlachojannis GJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29246909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coronary optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) for in vivo evaluation of stent healing: comparison with light and electron microscopy.
    Templin C; Meyer M; Müller MF; Djonov V; Hlushchuk R; Dimova I; Flueckiger S; Kronen P; Sidler M; Klein K; Nicholls F; Ghadri JR; Weber K; Paunovic D; Corti R; Hoerstrup SP; Lüscher TF; Landmesser U
    Eur Heart J; 2010 Jul; 31(14):1792-801. PubMed ID: 20525979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Post-stEnting assessment of Re-endothelialization with optical Frequency domain imaging aftEr Chronic Total Occlusion procedure: The PERFE-CTO Study Design and Rationale.
    Levesque S; Gamet A; Lattuca B; Lemoine J; Bressollette E; Avran A; Motreff P; Boudou N; Faurie B; Christiaens L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Jun; 21(6):760-764. PubMed ID: 31679911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Numerical analysis of astigmatism correction in gradient refractive index lens based optical coherence tomography catheters.
    Wang T; van der Steen AF; van Soest G
    Appl Opt; 2012 Jul; 51(21):5244-52. PubMed ID: 22858968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Serial morphological and functional assessment of drug-eluting balloon for in-stent restenotic lesions: mechanisms of action evaluated with angiography, optical coherence tomography, and fractional flow reserve.
    Agostoni P; Belkacemi A; Voskuil M; Nathoe HM; Doevendans PA; Stella PR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 23683736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative optical frequency domain imaging assessment of in-stent structures in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: impact of imaging sampling rate.
    Muramatsu T; García-García HM; Lee IS; Bruining N; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Circ J; 2012; 76(12):2822-31. PubMed ID: 22971949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kobayashi Y; Kitahara H; Tanaka S; Okada K; Kimura T; Ikeno F; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unfurling the coronary: a novel "flyover" 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography reconstruction method.
    Doherty J; Lowe HC
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 6(5):535-6. PubMed ID: 23702018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optical coherence tomography: from physical principles to clinical applications.
    Hamdan R; Gonzalez RG; Ghostine S; Caussin C
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2012 Oct; 105(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 23062484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In-vitro and in-vivo imaging of coronary artery stents with Heartbeat OCT.
    Cecchetti L; Wang T; Hoogendoorn A; Witberg KT; Ligthart JMR; Daemen J; van Beusekom HMM; Pfeiffer T; Huber RA; Wentzel JJ; van der Steen AFW; van Soest G
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1021-1029. PubMed ID: 32112229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Unexpected Measurement Error in Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Katamine M; Minami Y; Yanagisawa T; Meguro K; Shimohama T; Tojo T; Ako J
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 11(21):e179-e180. PubMed ID: 30343016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optical coherence tomography to evaluate coronary stent implantation and complications.
    Hayat U; Thondapu V; Ul Haq MA; Foin N; Jang IK; Barlis P
    Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26 Suppl 1():e55-68. PubMed ID: 26247272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Doppler-based lateral motion tracking for optical coherence tomography.
    Weiss N; van Leeuwen TG; Kalkman J
    Opt Lett; 2012 Jun; 37(12):2220-2. PubMed ID: 22739861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.