These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21994182)

  • 1. The Slip Induction Task: creating a window into cognitive control failures.
    Clark AJ; Parakh R; Smilek D; Roy EA
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):558-74. PubMed ID: 21994182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of top-down control during mental fatigue.
    Lorist MM
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1232():113-23. PubMed ID: 18687317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aging and inhibition of a prepotent motor response during an ongoing action.
    Potter LM; Grealy MA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Mar; 15(2):232-55. PubMed ID: 17851981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential effects in the Simon task: conflict adaptation or feature integration?
    Chen S; Melara RD
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1297():89-100. PubMed ID: 19666010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequence effects in cued task switching modulate response preparedness and repetition priming processes.
    Jamadar S; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):365-86. PubMed ID: 20003149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When cognitive control is calibrated: event-related potential correlates of adapting to information-processing conflict despite erroneous response preparation.
    Freitas AL; Banai R; Clark SL
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1226-33. PubMed ID: 19572903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive performance and electrophysiological indices of cognitive control: a validation study of conflict adaptation.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2012 May; 49(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 22292850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insights into the control of arm movement during body motion as revealed by EMG analyses.
    Blouin J; Guillaud E; Bresciani JP; Guerraz M; Simoneau M
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1309():40-52. PubMed ID: 19883633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Movements or targets: what makes an action in action-effect learning?
    Hoffmann J; Lenhard A; Sebald A; Pfister R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2433-49. PubMed ID: 19526438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action.
    Wenke D; Fleming SM; Haggard P
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 19945697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related differences in the attention network test (ANT).
    Gamboz N; Zamarian S; Cavallero C
    Exp Aging Res; 2010 Jul; 36(3):287-305. PubMed ID: 20544449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modification of planned actions.
    Obhi SS; Matkovich S; Gilbert SJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 18841355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts to effectors rather than goal locations.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 419(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 17485166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conceptual binding: integrated visual cues reduce processing costs in bimanual movements.
    Wenderoth N; Van Dooren M; Vandebroek A; De Vos J; Vangheluwe S; Stinear CM; Byblow WD; Swinnen SP
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jul; 102(1):302-11. PubMed ID: 19369359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of spatial information in advance task-set control: an event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 28(7):1404-18. PubMed ID: 18973567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between attentional capture and deviations in movement trajectories in a selective reaching task.
    Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 21507363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociating controlled from automatic processing in temporal preparation.
    Capizzi M; Sanabria D; Correa Á
    Cognition; 2012 May; 123(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 22397820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach.
    Byrne PA; Crawford JD
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jun; 103(6):3054-69. PubMed ID: 20457858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
    Tanaka H
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.