102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21995053)
1. A statistical model of shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur for fracture risk assessment.
Whitmarsh T; Fritscher KD; Humbert L; Del Rio Barquero LM; Roth T; Kammerlander C; Blauth M; Schubert R; Frangi AF
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 2):393-400. PubMed ID: 21995053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Whitmarsh T; Humbert L; De Craene M; Del Rio Barquero LM; Frangi AF
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2101-14. PubMed ID: 21803681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hip fracture discrimination from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry by statistical model registration.
Whitmarsh T; Fritscher KD; Humbert L; del Río Barquero LM; Roth T; Kammerlander C; Blauth M; Schubert R; Frangi AF
Bone; 2012 Nov; 51(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 22959281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the individual fracture risk of the proximal femur by using statistical appearance models.
Schuler B; Fritscher KD; Kuhn V; Eckstein F; Link TM; Schubert R
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2560-71. PubMed ID: 20632568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Bousson VD; Adams J; Engelke K; Aout M; Cohen-Solal M; Bergot C; Haguenauer D; Goldberg D; Champion K; Aksouh R; Vicaut E; Laredo JD
J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Apr; 26(4):881-93. PubMed ID: 20939025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?
Museyko O; Bousson V; Adams J; Laredo J-; Engelke K
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 26415934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.
Khoo BC; Lewis JR; Brown K; Prince RL
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Jan; 27(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 26282230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry.
Le Bras A; Kolta S; Soubrane P; Skalli W; Roux C; Mitton D
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 17097528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.
Cheng XG; Lowet G; Boonen S; Nicholson PH; Brys P; Nijs J; Dequeker J
Bone; 1997 Mar; 20(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 9071471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A preliminary dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based finite element model for assessing osteoporotic hip fracture risk.
Luo Y; Ferdous Z; Leslie WD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Dec; 225(12):1188-95. PubMed ID: 22320058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures.
Lang TF; Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; De Serio A; Cammisa M; Genant HK
Bone; 2002 Jan; 30(1):247-50. PubMed ID: 11792593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength.
Carpenter RD; Beaupré GS; Lang TF; Orwoll ES; Carter DR;
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1533-42. PubMed ID: 16059625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans.
Bergot C; Bousson V; Meunier A; Laval-Jeantet M; Laredo JD
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jul; 13(7):542-50. PubMed ID: 12111014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lower hip bone mass and proximal femur fractures in elderly patients: more valuable than lumbar vertebrae bone mineral density.
Shin HK; Choi JY; Lee J; Jeong HJ; Kim E; Park SJ; Jeon B; Lim JJ
Orthopedics; 2010 Dec; 33(12):875. PubMed ID: 21162517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Texture analysis, bone mineral density, and cortical thickness of the proximal femur: fracture risk prediction.
Rodríguez-Soto AE; Fritscher KD; Schuler B; Issever AS; Roth T; Kamelger F; Kammerlander C; Blauth M; Schubert R; Link TM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 21084915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proximal femur geometry assessed by hip structural analysis in hip fracture in women.
Iolascon G; Moretti A; Cannaviello G; Resmini G; Gimigliano F
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2015 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S17-21. PubMed ID: 26178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The observation of bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and histology during fracture healing at the femoral fracture site of rat].
Xu SW; Zhao GF; Li W; Wang JW
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 83(20):1826-8. PubMed ID: 14642093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture.
Gregory JS; Testi D; Stewart A; Undrill PE; Reid DM; Aspden RM
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Jan; 15(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 14605797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An early-life femoral shaft fracture and bone mineral density at adulthood.
Leppälä J; Kannus P; Niemi S; Sievänen H; Vuori I; Järvinen M
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 10692985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
