These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21995372)

  • 1. Behaviour of general dental practitioners in Germany regarding posterior restorations with flowable composites.
    Seemann R; Pfefferkorn F; Hickel R
    Int Dent J; 2011 Oct; 61(5):252-6. PubMed ID: 21995372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
    Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why, when, and how general practitioners restore endodontically treated teeth: a representative survey in Germany.
    Naumann M; Neuhaus KW; Kölpin M; Seemann R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 26082310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth.
    Gilmour AS; Evans P; Addy LD
    Br Dent J; 2007 May; 202(12):E32. PubMed ID: 17510663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozel E; Attar N
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 17489480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study.
    Neme AM; Maxson BB; Pink FE; Aksu MN
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 12413226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Liu JK; Chao CC; Liao FP; Chen YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11208208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Liu JK; Chang CH; Shieh DB
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15195731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal and internal adaptation of extended class I restorations lined with flowable composites.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    J Dent; 2003 May; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 12735916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Oct; 57(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 10614902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Placement of posterior composite restorations in United Kingdom dental practices: techniques, problems, and attitudes.
    Gilmour AS; Latif M; Addy LD; Lynch CD
    Int Dent J; 2009 Jun; 59(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 19637523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of flowable composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in class II composite restorations: an in vitro study.
    Reddy SN; Jayashankar DN; Nainan M; Shivanna V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 23579894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An audit on the placement and replacement of restorations in a general dental practice.
    Frost PM
    Prim Dent Care; 2002 Jan; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11901789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Shrinkage and Viscosity of Flowable Composite Liners on Cervical Microleakage of Class II Restorations: A Micro-CT Analysis.
    Nie J; Yap AU; Wang XY
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):656-664. PubMed ID: 30142038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Different Cavity Lining Techniques on Marginal Sealing of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro.
    Pedram P; Hooshmand T; Heidari S
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(6):895–901. PubMed ID: 30106395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes.
    Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 20448613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finishing and polishing procedures of composite restorations by Saudi dentists: a cross-sectional study.
    Alqarni MA; Togoo RA; Al Shahrani I; Phani CR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):657-61. PubMed ID: 24309345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.