These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21995372)

  • 21. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.
    Yip KH; Poon BK; Chu FC; Poon EC; Kong FY; Smales RJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1581-9. PubMed ID: 14719754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.
    Unlu N; Krakaya S; Ozer F; Say EC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 14737794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner.
    Efes BG; Dörter C; Gömeç Y; Koray F
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16708724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.
    Leevailoj C; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Moore BK; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Hall AC; Randall RC; Widstrom E; Forss H
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jun; 194(11):613-8; discussion 609. PubMed ID: 12819697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
    Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of the elastic modulus of low-viscosity resins on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations under occlusal loading.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P; Tagami J
    Dent Mater J; 2010 May; 29(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20467156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Class II resin composite restorations-tunnel vs. box-only in vitro and in vivo.
    Preusse PJ; Winter J; Amend S; Roggendorf MJ; Dudek MC; Krämer N; Frankenberger R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):737-744. PubMed ID: 33169273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations.
    Hernandes NM; Catelan A; Soares GP; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Martins LR; Aguiar FH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 23946230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in Class II adhesive restorations.
    Belli S; Orucoglu H; Yildirim C; Eskitascioglu G
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 17489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of flowable composite resins when utilized as liners in Class II posterior composite resin restorations.
    Turner EW; Shook LW; Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2002; 82(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 11979718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Peltz I; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010526. PubMed ID: 27780315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.