These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21995734)
41. Food formats for effective delivery of probiotics. Sanders ME; Marco ML Annu Rev Food Sci Technol; 2010; 1():65-85. PubMed ID: 22129330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Subtractive screening for probiotic properties of lactobacillus species from the human gastrointestinal tract in the search for new probiotics. Delgado S; O'Sullivan E; Fitzgerald G; Mayo B J Food Sci; 2007 Oct; 72(8):M310-5. PubMed ID: 17995611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Mechanisms of Probiotic Action in the Honeybee. Royan M Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr; 2019; 29(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 31679264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The probiotic paradox: live and dead cells are biological response modifiers. Adams CA Nutr Res Rev; 2010 Jun; 23(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 20403231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Mining indigenous honeybee gut microbiota for Aziz G; Tariq M; Zaidi AH Microbiology (Reading); 2021 Mar; 167(3):. PubMed ID: 33587693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Lactobacillus commensals autochthonous to human milk have the hallmarks of potent probiotics. Anjum J; Nazir S; Tariq M; Barrett K; Zaidi A Microbiology (Reading); 2020 Oct; 166(10):966-980. PubMed ID: 32886600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Screening of Lactobacillus strains of domestic goose origin against bacterial poultry pathogens for use as probiotics. Dec M; Puchalski A; Urban-Chmiel R; Wernicki A Poult Sci; 2014 Oct; 93(10):2464-72. PubMed ID: 25104766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Stress Response in Bifidobacteria. Schöpping M; Zeidan AA; Franzén CJ Microbiol Mol Biol Rev; 2022 Dec; 86(4):e0017021. PubMed ID: 36374074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Probiotic characters of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are a result of the ongoing gene acquisition and genome minimization evolutionary trends. Papizadeh M; Rohani M; Nahrevanian H; Javadi A; Pourshafie MR Microb Pathog; 2017 Oct; 111():118-131. PubMed ID: 28826768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Modulation of Lactobacillus plantarum gastrointestinal robustness by fermentation conditions enables identification of bacterial robustness markers. van Bokhorst-van de Veen H; Lee IC; Marco ML; Wels M; Bron PA; Kleerebezem M PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e39053. PubMed ID: 22802934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of Probiotic Potential and Safety Assessment of Lactobacillus pentosus MMP4 Isolated From Mare's Lactation. Choudhary J; Dubey RC; Sengar G; Dheeman S Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2019 Jun; 11(2):403-412. PubMed ID: 29846884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Isolation, Identification and Analyses of Lactobacillus Genus Bacteria with Probiotic Potential. Cherdyntseva TA; Kotova IB; Netrusov AI Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 897():103-11. PubMed ID: 26566644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Probiotic potential of novel strains of Lactobacillus plantarum Lp -1: In vitro studies. Baloch MN; Siddiqui R; Asad W; Saeed A; Haider F Pak J Pharm Sci; 2019 Jan; 32(1(Special)):445-452. PubMed ID: 30852483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Glutathione-mediated response to acid stress in the probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus salivarius. Lee K; Pi K; Kim EB; Rho BS; Kang SK; Lee HG; Choi YJ Biotechnol Lett; 2010 Jul; 32(7):969-72. PubMed ID: 20349113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Molecular insights into probiotic mechanisms of action employed against intestinal pathogenic bacteria. van Zyl WF; Deane SM; Dicks LMT Gut Microbes; 2020 Nov; 12(1):1831339. PubMed ID: 33112695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains isolated from porcine gastrointestinal tract. Kim PI; Jung MY; Chang YH; Kim S; Kim SJ; Park YH Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 74(5):1103-11. PubMed ID: 17136367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. FISH analysis of Lactobacillus biofilms in the gastrointestinal tract of different hosts. Lebeer S; Verhoeven TL; Claes IJ; De Hertogh G; Vermeire S; Buyse J; Van Immerseel F; Vanderleyden J; De Keersmaecker SC Lett Appl Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 52(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 21204880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Genomic features of lactic acid bacteria effecting bioprocessing and health. Klaenhammer TR; Barrangou R; Buck BL; Azcarate-Peril MA; Altermann E FEMS Microbiol Rev; 2005 Aug; 29(3):393-409. PubMed ID: 15964092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [ Antibiotic resistance of potential probiotic bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus from human gastrointestinal microbiome]. Botina SG; Poluéktova EU; Glazkova AA; Zakharevich NV; Koroban NV; Zinchenko VV; Babykin MM; Zhilenkova OG; Amerkhanova AM; Danilenko VN Mikrobiologiia; 2011; 80(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 21774182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Technological strategies ensuring the safe arrival of beneficial microorganisms to the gut: From food processing and storage to their passage through the gastrointestinal tract. Cassani L; Gomez-Zavaglia A; Simal-Gandara J Food Res Int; 2020 Mar; 129():108852. PubMed ID: 32036930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]