430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21995744)
1. Social cognition is not reducible to theory of mind: when children use deontic rules to predict the behaviour of others.
Clément F; Bernard S; Kaufmann L
Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Nov; 29(Pt 4):910-28. PubMed ID: 21995744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between second-order false belief and display rules reasoning: the integration of cognitive and affective social understanding.
Naito M; Seki Y
Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):150-64. PubMed ID: 19120423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrating relationship constructs and emotional experience into false belief tasks in preschool children.
Symons D; McLaughlin E; Moore C; Morine S
J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Dec; 67(3):423-47. PubMed ID: 9440301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Children's level of participation in a false-belief task, age, and theory of mind.
Ritblatt SN
J Genet Psychol; 2000 Mar; 161(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 10705584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Domain-general contributions to social reasoning: theory of mind and deontic reasoning re-explored.
McKinnon MC; Moscovitch M
Cognition; 2007 Feb; 102(2):179-218. PubMed ID: 16480974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking speakers' false beliefs: is theory of mind available earlier for word learning?
Houston-Price C; Goddard K; Séclier C; Grant SC; Reid CJ; Boyden LE; Williams R
Dev Sci; 2011 Jul; 14(4):623-34. PubMed ID: 21676084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The roles of maternal mind-mindedness and infant security of attachment in predicting preschoolers' understanding of visual perspective taking and false belief.
Laranjo J; Bernier A; Meins E; Carlson SM
J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Sep; 125():48-62. PubMed ID: 24814206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding theory of mind in children who are deaf.
Marschark M; Green V; Hindmarsh G; Walker S
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2000 Nov; 41(8):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11099123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deontic and epistemic reasoning in children.
Dack LA; Astington JW
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):94-114. PubMed ID: 21550613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Children's understanding of second-order mental states.
Miller SA
Psychol Bull; 2009 Sep; 135(5):749-73. PubMed ID: 19702381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding perspectives and emotions in contract violation: development of deontic and moral reasoning.
Keller M; Gummerum M; Wang XT; Lindsey S
Child Dev; 2004; 75(2):614-35. PubMed ID: 15056209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Young children's attribution of action to beliefs and desires.
Bartsch K; Wellman H
Child Dev; 1989 Aug; 60(4):946-64. PubMed ID: 2758888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Did she mean to do it? Acquiring a folk theory of intentionality.
Mull MS; Evans EM
J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Nov; 107(3):207-28. PubMed ID: 20553689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Theory of mind and social interest in zero-acquaintance play situations.
Moore C; Bosacki SL; Macgillivray S
Child Dev; 2011; 82(4):1163-72. PubMed ID: 21679169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deception dissociates from false belief reasoning in deaf children: implications for the implicit versus explicit theory of mind distinction.
de Villiers PA; de Villiers JG
Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):188-209. PubMed ID: 22429041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How do preschoolers' sharing behaviors relate to their theory of mind understanding?
Wu Z; Su Y
J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Apr; 120():73-86. PubMed ID: 24384326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring theory of mind after severe traumatic brain injury.
Muller F; Simion A; Reviriego E; Galera C; Mazaux JM; Barat M; Joseph PA
Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1088-99. PubMed ID: 19828142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two sources of evidence on the non-automaticity of true and false belief ascription.
Back E; Apperly IA
Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 20060965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Common and distinct neural networks for false-belief reasoning and inhibitory control.
Rothmayr C; Sodian B; Hajak G; Döhnel K; Meinhardt J; Sommer M
Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1705-13. PubMed ID: 21195194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trauma-related predictors of deontic reasoning: a pilot study in a community sample of children.
DePrince AP; Chu AT; Combs MD
Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Jul; 32(7):732-7. PubMed ID: 18617265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
