These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program. Varkarakis J; Pinggera GM; Sebe P; Berger A; Bartsch G; Horninger W Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 14972485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early catheter removal 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Noguchi M; Shimada A; Yahara J; Suekane S; Noda S Int J Urol; 2004 Nov; 11(11):983-8. PubMed ID: 15509202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Remzi M; Klingler HC; Tinzl MV; Fong YK; Lodde M; Kiss B; Marberger M Eur Urol; 2005 Jul; 48(1):83-9; discussion 89. PubMed ID: 15967256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of previous surgery on endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Stolzenburg JU; Ho KM; Do M; Rabenalt R; Dorschner W; Truss MC Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 15708047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy. Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australasia. Cathcart P; Murphy DG; Moon D; Costello AJ; Frydenberg M BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107 Suppl 3():11-9. PubMed ID: 21492370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. Cheng L; Koch MO; Juliar BE; Daggy JK; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Gardner TA J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(13):2911-7. PubMed ID: 15860849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors. Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]