102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21996167)
1. Regression of screening-detected breast cancer.
Kalager M
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Nov; 12(12):1083-4. PubMed ID: 21996167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study.
Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Mæhlen J
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Nov; 12(12):1118-24. PubMed ID: 21996169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Recommendations of the French Society of Mammography and Breast Pathology on quality criteria in mass screening for breast cancer in France].
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Oct; 89(10):510-1. PubMed ID: 7817080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Screening for breast cancer].
Nielsen H
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Jun; 158(23):3330-2. PubMed ID: 8686066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
Nowicki A; Stogowska I
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Summaries for patients: Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer with mammography screening.
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Apr; 156(7):I58. PubMed ID: 22473444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Unaccounted breast cancers do not infer regression of tumors.
Chu DZ
Arch Intern Med; 2009 May; 169(10):999. PubMed ID: 19468100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluating the benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening].
Kullmann T; Misset JL
Orv Hetil; 2010 Aug; 151(35):1409-14. PubMed ID: 20719714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of future breast cancer risk.
Engstrom PF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1993; 2(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 8420605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening comes full circle.
Baum M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1490-1. PubMed ID: 15494593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. On the benefits and harms of screening for breast cancer.
Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 33(1):56-64; discussion 69-73. PubMed ID: 15075145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Mammography].
Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnosis and morphologic verification of tumors detected by mammography screening].
Cherenkov VG; Petrov AB; Ivanchenko VV; Tverezovskiĭ SA; Frumkin BB
Vopr Onkol; 2013; 59(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 23814838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance and effectiveness of organised breast cancer screening in Finland.
Sarkeala T
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(8):1618. PubMed ID: 18759146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The UK breast-screening programme should start at age 47 years.
Sasieni P; Cuzick J
Lancet; 2003 Jul; 362(9379):246-7. PubMed ID: 12885493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Screening mammography for early diagnosis of breast cancer: facts, controversies, and the implementation in Israel].
Allweis TM; Nissan A; Spira RM; Sklair-Levy M; Freund HR; Peretz T
Harefuah; 2003 Apr; 142(4):281-6, 317. PubMed ID: 12754879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Overdiagnosis in mammography screening].
Zahl PH; Maehlen J
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Sep; 124(17):2238-9. PubMed ID: 15356688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re: Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.
Clark R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):936. PubMed ID: 15956657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Programme sensitivity and effectiveness of mammography service screening in Helsinki, Finland.
Anttila A; Koskela J; Hakama M
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(4):153-8. PubMed ID: 12518004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
