BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21996337)

  • 1. Colour discrimination of dental professionals and colour deficient laypersons.
    Poljak-Guberina R; Celebic A; Powers JM; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e17-22. PubMed ID: 21996337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.
    Gokce HS; Piskin B; Ceyhan D; Gokce SM; Arisan V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 20188236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shade-matching abilities of dental laboratory technicians using a commercial light source.
    Jasinevicius TR; Curd FM; Schilling L; Sadan A
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 18(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 19166550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental Shade Matching and Value Discernment Abilities of First-Year Dental Students.
    Imbery TA; Tran D; Baechle MA; Hankle JL; Janus C
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Dec; 27(9):821-827. PubMed ID: 29533495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the ability of dental technician students and graduate dentists to match tooth color.
    Sinmazisik G; Trakyali G; Tarcin B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1559-66. PubMed ID: 25134993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvement in colour vision parameters following successful trabeculectomy.
    Magacho L; Henderer JD; Lankaranian D; Steinmann WC; Spaeth GL
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 16637837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of factors affecting dental shade matching in first-year dental students.
    Imbery TA; Killough C; Baechle MA; Hankle JL; Janus C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 33637325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Characteristics of color discrimination changes in diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy].
    Sun TS; Zhang MN
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 49(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 23601465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of shade matching performed by colour blind and normal dental students using 3D Master and Vita Lumin shade guides.
    Vafaee F; Rakhshan V; Vafaei M; Khoshhal M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 22474932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of time consumption and color matching results of different dental occupational groups.
    Ortolan SM; Persic S; Celebic A; Mehulic K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23998147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introducing a new computer-based test for the clinical evaluation of color discrimination.
    Melamud A; Simpson E; Traboulsi EI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):953-60. PubMed ID: 17157581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a common shade guide to test the perception of differences in the shades and value by members of the dental team.
    Geary JL; Kinirons MJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 11819873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods.
    Lasserre JF; Pop-Ciutrila IS; Colosi HA
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e29-36. PubMed ID: 22101123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of color discrimination tests used in dentistry.
    Simionato A; Pecho OE; Della Bona A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Sep; 33(6):865-873. PubMed ID: 33125179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
    Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.