BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21996548)

  • 1. Influence of different types of sockets on the range of motion of the hip joint by the transfemoral amputee.
    Klotz R; Colobert B; Botino M; Permentiers I
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 54(7):399-410. PubMed ID: 21996548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current transfemoral sockets.
    Schuch CM; Pritham CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):48-54. PubMed ID: 10212595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of NU-FlexSIV Socket Performance for Military Service Members with Transfemoral Amputation.
    Brown SE; Russell Esposito E; Ikeda AJ; Wilken JM; Fatone S
    US Army Med Dep J; 2018; (2-18):38-47. PubMed ID: 30623397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
    Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of ischial ramal angle for transfemoral ischial containment sockets.
    Quigley M; Dillon MP; Fernandez RG; Erbas B; Briggs C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30044195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stump-socket interface pressure as an aid to socket design in prostheses for trans-femoral amputees--a preliminary study.
    Lee VS; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9184457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
    Fatone S; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets.
    Paternò L; Truppa L; Ibrahimi M; Rosini E; Gruppioni E; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Apr; 48(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 37379468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial.
    Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronal plane socket stability during gait in persons with transfemoral amputation: Pilot study.
    Fatone S; Dillon M; Stine R; Tillges R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(8):1217-28. PubMed ID: 25629691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Hybrid Subischial Socket for Persons With Transfemoral Amputation: Gait Parameters and Clinical Assessment of a Case Series.
    Pellegrini R; Denza G; Brunelli S; Zenardi D; Imperio M; Vannozzi G; Traballesi M
    Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2021; 4(1):36252. PubMed ID: 37614930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of transfemoral socket adduction on pelvic and trunk stabilization during level walking - A biomechanical study.
    Köhler TM; Blumentritt S; Braatz F; Bellmann M
    Gait Posture; 2021 Sep; 89():169-177. PubMed ID: 34311436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective evaluations and objective measurements of the ischial-ramal containment prosthesis.
    Hachisuka K; Umezu Y; Ogata H; Ohmine S; Shinkoda K; Arizono H
    J UOEH; 1999 Jun; 21(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 10434359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The biomechanical effects of the inclusion of a torque absorber on trans-femoral amputee gait, a pilot study.
    Van der Linden ML; Twiste N; Rithalia SV
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Apr; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 12043924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of prosthetic alignment on gait and biomechanical loading in individuals with transfemoral amputation: A preliminary study.
    Zhang T; Bai X; Liu F; Fan Y
    Gait Posture; 2019 Jun; 71():219-226. PubMed ID: 31078826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of transhumeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study.
    Resnik L; Patel T; Cooney SG; Crisco JJ; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 25425411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of transverse prosthetic alignment changes on socket reaction moments during gait in individuals with transtibial amputation.
    Hashimoto H; Kobayashi T; Gao F; Kataoka M; Orendurff MS; Okuda K
    Gait Posture; 2018 Sep; 65():8-14. PubMed ID: 30558951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transtibial amputee gait during slope walking with the unity suspension system.
    Gholizadeh H; Lemaire ED; Sinitski EH
    Gait Posture; 2018 Sep; 65():205-212. PubMed ID: 30558933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket.
    Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.