136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2199671)
1. A screening programme that worked: discussion paper.
Hakama M
J R Soc Med; 1990 May; 83(5):322-4. PubMed ID: 2199671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Rare cytologic findings by gynecologic examinations (author's transl)].
Büttner HH; Beust M
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1977; 47(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 921484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for cervical cancer: recommendation statement.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Am Fam Physician; 2012 Sep; 86(6):555-9. PubMed ID: 23062047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Eradication of cervical cancer in Latin America.
Bosch FX
Salud Publica Mex; 2016 Apr; 58(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 27557367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The natural history of Pap test screening in a rural population.
Rosenfeld JA
Tenn Med; 1998 May; 91(5):179-82. PubMed ID: 9584605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopy in the management of early cervical neoplasia.
Herbeck G; Menken FC
Endoscopy; 1977 Nov; 9(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 590215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical aspects of cervix carcinoma and its preliminary stages].
Kyank H; Büttner HH
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1977 May; 71(9):424-30. PubMed ID: 878515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer screening in Iceland: a case-control study.
Geirsson G; Kristiansdottir R; Sigurdsson K; Moss S; Tulinius H
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):37-41. PubMed ID: 3570413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical assessment of screening methods for cervical neoplasia.
Sankaranarayanan R; Gaffikin L; Jacob M; Sellors J; Robles S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 May; 89 Suppl 2():S4-S12. PubMed ID: 15823266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of cytologic and gynecology screening tests].
Sachs H
Fortschr Med; 1974 Sep; 92(26):1037-41. PubMed ID: 4606060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Status of screening tests for cervical cancer and its precancerous lesion].
Zhao FH; Rong SD; Qiao YL
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Dec; 23(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 12901114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.
Sankaranarayanan R; Budukh AM; Rajkumar R
Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(10):954-62. PubMed ID: 11693978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A plea for colposcopy.
Bacaj T
Va Med Mon (1918); 1975 Jun; 102(6):465-7. PubMed ID: 1154852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Efficiency of preventive care examinations in carcinoma of the uterine cervix].
Zinser HK
Fortschr Med; 1974 Mar; 92(9):357-9. PubMed ID: 4819503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer].
Boulanger JC; Naepels P
Rev Prat; 2001 Sep; 51(13):1426-31. PubMed ID: 11601071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lesbians and cervical screening.
Bailey JV; Kavanagh J; Owen C; McLean KA; Skinner CJ
Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Jun; 50(455):481-2. PubMed ID: 10962789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Success and failure in screening for cervical cancer.
Symonds RP
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1994; 6(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 7986763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cancer screening in the early post vaccine era.
Waxman AG
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):537-48; vii. PubMed ID: 19061815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Organization and efficacy of cytological examinations in the mass screening of women in the Moldavian SSR].
Khonelidze GB; Lazarev IM; Cheban DA; Zavtur LV
Vopr Onkol; 1984; 30(9):91-4. PubMed ID: 6238482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The detection of precancerous cervical lesions can be significantly increased.
Marshall Austin R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Feb; 127(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 12562226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
