These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21997330)

  • 1. Default motor preparation under conditions of response uncertainty.
    Forgaard CJ; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Dec; 215(3-4):235-45. PubMed ID: 21997330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unified nature of bimanual movements revealed by separating the preparation of each arm.
    Blinch J; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1931-44. PubMed ID: 25850406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motor preparation is modulated by the resolution of the response timing information.
    Carlsen AN; Mackinnon CD
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1322():38-49. PubMed ID: 20138165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precues enable multiple response preprogramming: evidence from startle.
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Summers JJ; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ; Franks IM
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 19207195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets.
    Bock O; Arnold K
    Exp Brain Res; 1992; 90(1):209-16. PubMed ID: 1521609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Klapp ST; Jagacinski RJ; Franks IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2005-21. PubMed ID: 25068697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal uncertainty does not affect response latencies of movements produced during startle reactions.
    Cressman EK; Carlsen AN; Chua R; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 16604311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor preparation and the effects of practice: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Hodges NJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 125(2):226-40. PubMed ID: 21280935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task: preparation for movement.
    Jaeger D; Gilman S; Aldridge JW
    Exp Brain Res; 1993; 95(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 8405253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beneficial effects of ambiguous precues: parallel motor preparation or reduced premotoric processing time?
    Jentzsch I; Leuthold H; Richard Ridderinkhof K
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 15032988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preparation of timing structure involves two independent sub-processes.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Klapp ST; Franks IM
    Psychol Res; 2018 Sep; 82(5):981-996. PubMed ID: 28567604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential effects of startle on reaction time for finger and arm movements.
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ; Franks IM
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 101(1):306-14. PubMed ID: 19005006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motor preparation of spatially and temporally defined movements: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Hodges NJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 106(2):885-94. PubMed ID: 21613586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unexpected acoustic stimulation during action preparation reveals gradual re-specification of movement direction.
    Marinovic W; Tresilian J; Chapple JL; Riek S; Carroll TJ
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():23-32. PubMed ID: 28215747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of amplitude specification in brief interceptive actions.
    Marinovic W; Plooy A; Tresilian JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(2):275-88. PubMed ID: 18415092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Startle reveals an absence of advance motor programming in a Go/No-go task.
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Dakin CJ; Sanderson DJ; Inglis JT; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18262355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visually guided, aimed movements can be unaffected by stimulus-response uncertainty.
    Wright CE; Marino VF; Belovsky SA; Chubb C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(3):475-96. PubMed ID: 17242915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motivation and movement: the effect of monetary incentive on performance speed.
    Mir P; Trender-Gerhard I; Edwards MJ; Schneider SA; Bhatia KP; Jahanshahi M
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 209(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 21337028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mechanisms of movement preparation: a precuing study.
    Bock O; Eversheim U
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 Feb; 108(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 10680760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impairment of movement initiation and execution but not preparation in idiopathic dystonia.
    Jahanshahi M; Rowe J; Fuller R
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Oct; 140(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 11685399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.