145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21997337)
1. Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
Gstoettner WK; Van de Heyning P; O'Connor AF; Kiefer J; Morera C; Sainz M; Vermeire K; McDonald S; Cavallé L; Valdecasas JG; Adunka OF; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Helbig S
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 21997337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].
de Almeida K; Taguchi CK
Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.
Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term follow-up of hearing preservation in electric-acoustic stimulation patients.
Mertens G; Punte AK; Cochet E; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1765-72. PubMed ID: 25133472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter US Clinical Trial With an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes.
Pillsbury HC; Dillon MT; Buchman CA; Staecker H; Prentiss SM; Ruckenstein MJ; Bigelow DC; Telischi FF; Martinez DM; Runge CL; Friedland DR; Blevins NH; Larky JB; Alexiades G; Kaylie DM; Roland PS; Miyamoto RT; Backous DD; Warren FM; El-Kashlan HK; Slager HK; Reyes C; Racey AI; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 29342054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new audio processor for combined electric and acoustic stimulation for the treatment of partial deafness.
Lorens A; Zgoda M; Skarzynski H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 132(7):739-50. PubMed ID: 22668312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade.
von Ilberg CA; Baumann U; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Adunka OF
Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16 Suppl 2():1-30. PubMed ID: 21606646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
Helbig S; Baumann U
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():81-87. PubMed ID: 19955724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [An overview of the studies on combined electric and acoustic stimulation of auditory system].
Guan T; Zhu Z; Ye D
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):1146-9. PubMed ID: 19947508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users.
Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
