467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21997545)
1. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer with low-dose aspirin in combination with endoscopy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Zullo A; Launois R; Benamouzig R
Gut; 2012 Aug; 61(8):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21997545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combination aspirin and/or calcium chemoprevention with colonoscopy in colorectal cancer prevention: cost-effectiveness analyses.
Pence BC; Belasco EJ; Lyford CP
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Mar; 22(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 23250933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G
Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Loss of efficacy and cost-effectiveness when screening colonoscopy is performed by nongastroenterologists.
Hassan C; Rex DK; Zullo A; Cooper GS
Cancer; 2012 Sep; 118(18):4404-11. PubMed ID: 22707430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
Hassan C; Zullo A; Winn S; Morini S
Endoscopy; 2008 May; 40(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 18302080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening based on risk for colorectal cancer is the most cost-effective approach.
Dan YY; Chuah BY; Koh DC; Yeoh KG
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 10(3):266-71.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22100624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aspirin chemoprevention in patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
DuPont AW; Arguedas MR; Wilcox CM
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Aug; 26(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 17635378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cost-effectiveness of aspirin versus cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors for colorectal carcinoma chemoprevention in healthy individuals.
Hur C; Simon LS; Gazelle GS
Cancer; 2004 Jul; 101(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 15222006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Summaries for patients. Is aspirin a cost-effective addition to colorectal cancer screening?
Ann Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 135(9):1. PubMed ID: 11759636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Benamouzig R
Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):456-64. PubMed ID: 22531982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Bauerfeind P
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 94(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 10445561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening of colorectal cancer.
Winawer SJ
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):699-722. PubMed ID: 16226687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries.
Wu GH; Wang YM; Yen AM; Wong JM; Lai HC; Warwick J; Chen TH
BMC Cancer; 2006 May; 6():136. PubMed ID: 16723013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk analyses for screening sigmoidoscopy based on a colorectal cancer (CRC) population.
Mulder SA; Ouwendijk RJ; Giard RW; Van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2009; 44(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18836946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
